Engineering Yeast Cells to Facilitate Information Exchange

Although continuous advances in theoretical modelling of Molecular Communications (MC) are observed, there is still an insuperable gap between theory and experimental testbeds, especially at the microscale. In this paper, the development of the first testbed incorporating engineered yeast cells is reported. Different from the existing literature, eukaryotic yeast cells are considered for both the sender and the receiver, with $\alpha $ -factor molecules facilitating the information transfer. The use of such cells is motivated mainly by the well understood biological mechanism of yeast mating, together with their genetic amenability. In addition, recent advances in yeast biosensing establish yeast as a suitable detector and a neat interface to in-body sensor networks. The system under consideration is presented first, and the mathematical models of the underlying biological processes leading to an end-to-end (E2E) system are given. The experimental setup is then described and used to obtain experimental results which validate the developed mathematical models. Beyond that, the ability of the system to effectively generate output pulses in response to repeated stimuli is demonstrated, reporting one event per two hours. However, fast RNA fluctuations indicate cell responses in less than three minutes, demonstrating the potential for much higher rates in the future.

[1]  A. Burkovski,et al.  Closed Loop Molecular Communication Testbed: Setup, Interference Analysis, and Experimental Results , 2023, ArXiv.

[2]  Lukas Stratmann,et al.  Decoding Multiple Interfering Signals in a Macroscopic Air-based Molecular Communication System , 2023, NANOCOM.

[3]  B. Unluturk,et al.  A Testbed for Molecular Communication using a Microfluidic Device with Fluorescent Nanoparticles , 2023, NANOCOM.

[4]  A. Pitsillides,et al.  Validation of Yeast Cell-to-Cell Communication Models with Experimental Data , 2023, NANOCOM.

[5]  T. Lu,et al.  Sub-1.4 cm^3 capsule for detecting labile inflammatory biomarkers in situ , 2023, Nature.

[6]  J. Kirchner,et al.  The Development of a Biocompatible Testbed for Molecular Communication With Magnetic Nanoparticles , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[7]  A. Springer,et al.  Salinity-Based Molecular Communication in Microfluidic Channels , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[8]  C. Guaragnella,et al.  Biological and technical challenges for implementation of yeast‐based biosensors , 2022, Microbial biotechnology.

[9]  Poonam Bheda,et al.  Quantitative RNA imaging in single live cells reveals age-dependent asymmetric inheritance. , 2022, Cell reports.

[10]  Federico Calì,et al.  Comprehensive step-by-step procedure to setup a molecular communication through liquid experiment , 2022, MethodsX.

[11]  Xiaodong Yang,et al.  A Molecular Communication Platform Based on Body Area Nanonetwork , 2022, Nanomaterials.

[12]  Robert Schober,et al.  Media Modulation in Molecular Communications , 2021, ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[13]  Luca Fichera,et al.  Graphene Quantum Dots enable digital communication through biological fluids , 2021 .

[14]  Federico Calì,et al.  Carbon Quantum Dots from Lemon Waste Enable Communication among Biodevices , 2021, Chemosensors.

[15]  H. Birkan Yilmaz,et al.  Underwater Testbed for Molecular Communication , 2021, 2021 29th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU).

[16]  Sasitharan Balasubramaniam,et al.  Microfluidic-Based Bacterial Molecular Computing on a Chip , 2021, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[17]  Dimitra N. Stratis-Cullum,et al.  Bioelectronic control of a microbial community using surface-assembled electrogenetic cells to route signals , 2021, Nature Nanotechnology.

[18]  R. Schober,et al.  Experimental System for Molecular Communication in Pipe Flow With Magnetic Nanoparticles , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[19]  Peter A. Hoeher,et al.  A testbed and simulation framework for air-based molecular communication using fluorescein , 2020, NANOCOM.

[20]  Haitham Hassanieh,et al.  Understanding and embracing the complexities of the molecular communication channel in liquids , 2020, MobiCom.

[21]  Chan-Byoung Chae,et al.  Deep Learning-based Human Implantable Nano Molecular Communications , 2020, ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[22]  S. Maerkl,et al.  Single-Cell Tracing Dissects Regulation of Maintenance and Inheritance of Transcriptional Reinduction Memory. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[23]  Luca Fichera,et al.  Fluorescent nanoparticle-based Internet of things. , 2020, Nanoscale.

[24]  W. Stark,et al.  YestroSens, a field-portable S. cerevisiae biosensor device for the detection of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Reliability and stability. , 2019, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[25]  Alan Marshall,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Analysis of Macro-Scale Molecular Communications Within Closed Boundaries , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[26]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  A Molecular Communication Testbed Based on Proton Pumping Bacteria: Methods and Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[27]  Robert Wille,et al.  Information Encoding in Droplet-Based Microfluidic Systems: First Practical Study , 2019, NANOCOM.

[28]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Moving Forward With Molecular Communication: From Theory to Human Health Applications , 2019, Proc. IEEE.

[29]  H. Koeppl,et al.  A tightly regulated and adjustable CRISPR-dCas9 based AND gate in yeast , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Biological Optical-to-Chemical Signal Conversion Interface: A Small-Scale Modulator for Molecular Communications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[31]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Experimental Molecular Communication Testbed Based on Magnetic Nanoparticles in Duct Flow , 2018, 2018 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[32]  Ozgur B. Akan,et al.  Controlled Information Transfer Through An In Vivo Nervous System , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[33]  G. Li-Destri,et al.  Fluorescent Quantum Dots Make Feasible Long-Range Transmission of Molecular Bits. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[34]  Sonja Billerbeck,et al.  A modular yeast biosensor for low-cost point-of-care pathogen detection , 2017, Science Advances.

[35]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  A Novel Experimental Platform for In-Vessel Multi-Chemical Molecular Communications , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[36]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Fundamentals of Molecular Information and Communication Science , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[37]  Anmar Khadra,et al.  Mathematical model of galactose regulation and metabolic consumption in yeast. , 2016, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  J. Boulanger,et al.  Combining Spinach-tagged RNA and gene localization to image gene expression in live yeast , 2015, Nature Communications.

[39]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Efficient Sampling of Bacterial Signal Transduction for Detection of Pulse-Amplitude Modulated Molecular Signals , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[40]  Jessica L. Terrell,et al.  Functionalizing Soft Matter for Molecular Communication , 2015, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[41]  Tatsuya Suda,et al.  Externally Controllable Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[42]  Takahiro Hara,et al.  Cooperative Target Tracking by a Mobile Bionanosensor Network , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[43]  Mauro Femminella,et al.  Modeling CD40-Based Molecular Communications in Blood Vessels , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[44]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  A Molecular Communication System Model for Particulate Drug Delivery Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Cell-to-Cell Communication Circuits: Quantitative Analysis of Synthetic Logic Gates , 2012, Front. Physio..

[46]  T. Elston,et al.  Positive roles for negative regulators in the mating response of yeast , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[47]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Noise Analysis in Ligand-Binding Reception for Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[48]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Diffusion-Based Noise Analysis for Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[49]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Molecular communication options for long range nanonetworks , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[50]  T. Suda,et al.  Microplatform for intercellular communication , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems.

[51]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[52]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[53]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway , 2004, Yeast.

[54]  P. J. Bhat,et al.  Transcriptional control of the GAL/MEL regulon of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanism of galactose‐mediated signal transduction , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[55]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Protease helps yeast find mating partners , 1998, Nature.

[56]  M. Snyder,et al.  Pheromone-regulated Genes Required for Yeast Mating Differentiation , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[57]  M. Whiteway,et al.  Pheromone signalling and polarized morphogenesis in yeast. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[58]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Identification of genes required for normal pheromone-induced cell polarization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Genetics.

[59]  S. Fields,et al.  The pheromone signal pathway inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1992, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[60]  S. Fields,et al.  Pheromone-dependent phosphorylation of the yeast STE12 protein correlates with transcriptional activation. , 1991, Genes & development.

[61]  T. A. Brown,et al.  A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[62]  S. Fields,et al.  The yeast STE12 protein binds to the DNA sequence mediating pheromone induction. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Identification and regulation of a gene required for cell fusion during mating of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[64]  G. Fink,et al.  Two genes required for cell fusion during yeast conjugation: evidence for a pheromone-induced surface protein , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[65]  T. Manney,et al.  Expression of the BAR1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: induction by the alpha mating pheromone of an activity associated with a secreted protein , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[66]  R. K. Chan,et al.  Isolation and genetic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to G1 arrest by a factor and alpha factor pheromones , 1982, Molecular and cellular biology.

[67]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Channel Parameter Studies with a Biocompatible Testbed for Molecular Communication Based on Magnetic Nanoparticles: Methods and Data , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[68]  C. Pitris,et al.  A Yeast Pheromone Testbed for Molecular Communication Validation , 2022 .

[69]  Federico Calì,et al.  Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Secure Communication Among Implantable Medical Devices , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[70]  R. Schober,et al.  Integration of Molecular Communications into Future Generation Wireless Networks , 2019 .

[71]  I. Akyildiz,et al.  An End-to-End Model of Plant Pheromone Channel for Long Range Molecular Communication , 2017, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[72]  Tadashi Nakano,et al.  Molecular Communication , 2005 .

[73]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[74]  G. Saari,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae BAR1 gene encodes an exported protein with homology to pepsin. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.