Effects of prolonged omnilateral gravistimulation on the ultrastructure of statocytes and on the graviresponse of roots

Statocytes of vertically growing roots of Lepidium sativum L. exhibit a strict polarity: The nucleus is positioned near the proximal periclinal cell wall, amyloplasts are sedimented on a complex of rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) consisting of parallel cisternae near the distal periclinal cell wall.When 24 h old, vertically grown roots are rotated for an additional 20 h on a horizontal clinostat, this polarity is destroyed. Furthermore, the prolonged omnilateral stimulation leads to a damage of the statocytes, which in some cases ends in the self-destruction of the sensitive cells. The different components of the ultrastructural respones of the statocytes are: Displacement of the nucleus; changes in amount and distribution of the ER; loss of amyloplast starch; confluence of lipid droplets to large aggregates: a considerable increase of the lytic compartment. In addition, even anticlinal cell walls may be lysed up to small stumps. As all these effects are clearly restricted to the statocytes, only these cells are able to respond to the continuously changing direction of the gravity vector, thus perceiving gravity as such.After being exposed horizontally, the graviresponse of rotated roots is delayed as compared to the controls. About 20% of the rotated roots do not respond (curve) at all, but grow perpendicular in relation to the gravity vector. Perception of gravity is inevitably correlated with the polarity and the integrity of the statocytes.

[1]  D. Volkmann,et al.  Verursacht differentieller Druck der Amyloplasten auf ein komplexes Endomembransystem die Geoperzeption in Wurzeln? , 1971, Planta.

[2]  A. Sievers,et al.  Cell polarity in root statocytes in spite of simulated weightlessness , 1976, Die Naturwissenschaften.

[3]  E. D. Brain.  STUDIES IN THE EFFECTS OF PROLONGED ROTATION OF PLANTS ON A HORIZONTAL KLINOSTAT. II. ANATOMICAL STRUCTURE , 1939 .

[4]  L. E. Forrence,et al.  Increased Ethylene Production during Clinostat Experiments May Cause Leaf Epinasty. , 1972, Plant physiology.

[5]  E. D. Brain.  STUDIES IN THE EFFECTS OF PROLONGED ROTATION OF PLANTS ON A HORIZONTAL KLINOSTAT , 1942 .

[6]  D. Volkmann.  Amyloplasten und Endomembranen: Das Geopefzeptionssystem der Primärwurzel , 1974, Protoplasma.

[7]  W. Hensel,et al.  Ethylene Production during Clinostat Rotation and Effect on Root Geotropism , 1980 .

[8]  T. Iversen.  Elimination of Geotropic Responsiveness in Roots of Cress (Lepidium sativum) by Removal of Statolith Starch. , 1969, Physiologia plantarum.

[9]  J. Hills.  Distribution and Redistribution , 2004, Revival: Society in the Making: Hungarian Social and Societal Policy, 1945-75 (1979).

[10]  P. Larsen,et al.  Geotropism. An introduction , 1962 .

[11]  D K Chapman,et al.  Morphology of Arabidopsis Grown under Chronic Centrifugation and on the Clinostat. , 1976, Plant physiology.

[12]  S. A. Gordon,et al.  The Effect of Gravity Compensation on Growth and Cell Wall‐loosening Enzymes in Helianthus annuus Hypocotyls , 1972 .

[13]  A. Sievers,et al.  Responses of roots to simulated weightlessness on the fast-rotating clinostat. , 1979, Life sciences and space research.

[14]  K. Thimann,et al.  Biosatellite II experiments: preliminary results. , 1968, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  H. Muller,et al.  Approximation to a gravity-free situation for the human organism achievable at moderate expense. , 1958, Science.

[16]  J. J. Breen,et al.  Simulated Low-gravity Environments and Respiratory Metabolism in Avena Seedlings. , 1966, Plant physiology.

[17]  A. Sievers,et al.  [Does differential pressure of amyloplasts on a complex endomembrane system cause geoperception in roots?]. , 1971, Planta.