Optimal location of FACTS devices for damping oscillations using residue factor

This paper proposes a residue method to find the optimal location of the FACTS controllers to damp out the inter-area mode of oscillations. Three types of FACTS controllers have been considered, which include static var compensator, thyristor-controlled series compensator and unified power flow controller. The residue method is base on the facts that it is the product of the modepsilas observability and controllability index of FACTS controllers to the critical mode. The placements of FACTS controllers have been obtained for the base case and placement base of loss sensitivity is also introduced. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on two area 11 bus systems and New England 39-bus system.

[1]  P. Korba,et al.  Application of FACTS devices for damping of power system oscillations , 2005, 2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech.

[2]  Hari Om Gupta,et al.  FACTS devices location for enhancement of total transfer capability , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[3]  Seema Singh,et al.  Placement of FACTS controllers using modal controllability indices to damp out power system oscillations , 2007 .

[4]  Arturo Roman Messina,et al.  An efficient placement algorithm of multiple controllers for damping power system oscillations , 1999, 1999 IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36364).

[5]  A. David,et al.  Optimal dispatch under transmission contracts , 1999 .

[6]  K. M. Son,et al.  On the robust LQG control of TCSC for damping power system oscillations , 2000 .

[7]  P. Korba,et al.  Self-tuning controller for damping of power system oscillations with FACTS devices , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[8]  B. Chaudhuri,et al.  Robust damping of multiple swing modes employing global stabilizing signals with a TCSC , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Concepts for design of FACTS controllers to damp power swings , 1995 .

[10]  G. B. Shrestha,et al.  Allocation of TCSC devices to optimize total transmission capacity in a competitive power market , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[11]  M. Ghandhari,et al.  A Robust Control Strategy for Shunt and Series Reactive Compensators to Dame Electromechanical Oscillations , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  Seema Singh,et al.  Congestion management by optimising FACTS device location , 2000, DRPT2000. International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings (Cat. No.00EX382).

[13]  Rusejla Sadiković.  Use of FACTS Devices for Power Flow Control and Damping of Oscillations in Power Systems , 2006 .

[14]  A. Kazemi,et al.  FACTS devices in deregulated electric power systems: a review , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings.

[15]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Damping controller design for power system oscillations using global signals , 1996 .

[16]  Udaya Annakkage,et al.  Output feedback TCSC controllers to improve damping of meshed multi-machine power systems , 1997 .

[17]  K.Y. Lee,et al.  Choice of FACTS device control inputs for damping interarea oscillations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Hiroshi Okamoto,et al.  A method for identification of effective locations of variable impedance apparatus on enhancement of steady-state stability in large scale power systems , 1995 .

[19]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Power Quality Engineering , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[20]  A. David,et al.  Placement of FACTS devices in open power market , 2000 .

[21]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .