Alumni & Tenured Participants in MOOCs: Analysis of Two Years of MOOC Discussion Channel Activity

This study investigates chat room data from a massive open online course (MOOC) that has been organized several times since January 2012. What makes the organization unique is that the chat room has always remained the same, allowing past participants to mingle with the new course takers. Participants who have previously attended the course have started to support the novices, voluntarily taking the role of mentors, while at the same time also learning themselves. Two and a half years of chat logs and interviews show that it is possible that a community consisting of previous and current participants emerges naturally. Furthermore, there are plenty of students that unconditionally help others, even when they themselves no longer attend the course. Our observations suggest that communities of practice emerge naturally around the chat rooms of MOOCs.

[1]  Anirban Dasgupta,et al.  Superposter behavior in MOOC forums , 2014, L@S.

[2]  R. Elizabeth,et al.  Electropolis: Communication and community on internet relay chat , 1991 .

[3]  Sarita Yardi.  The role of the backchannel in collaborative learning environments , 2006 .

[4]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Communication patterns in massively open online courses , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[5]  Todd Graham,et al.  Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of "Superparticipants" , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Chatrooms in MOOCs: all talk and no action , 2014, L@S.

[7]  Paul Mutton,et al.  Inferring and visualizing social networks on Internet relay chat , 2004, Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004..

[8]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Media Choice and Identity Work: A Case Study of Information Communication Technology Use in a Peer Community , 2014 .

[9]  Jaakko Kurhila,et al.  Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming , 2012, SIGITE '12.

[10]  Bette Gray.  Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. , 2004 .

[11]  Scott Rixner,et al.  Facilitating human interaction in an online programming course , 2014, SIGCSE.

[12]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  The future of e-learning communities , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  A field study of use of synchronous chat in online courses , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[15]  Jean Lave,et al.  Situating learning in communities of practice , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[16]  Thomas Vikberg,et al.  Early Start in Software Coaching , 2013, XP.

[17]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[18]  Thomas Vikberg,et al.  Massive increase in eager TAs: experiences from extreme apprenticeship-based CS1 , 2013, ITiCSE '13.

[19]  Pin-Ju Chen,et al.  Facilitating MOOCs learning through weekly meet-up: a case study in Taiwan , 2014, L@S.

[20]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Knowledge-sharing in an online community of health-care professionals , 2007, Inf. Technol. People.

[21]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[22]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[23]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Talkabout: small-group discussions in massive global classes , 2014, L@S.

[24]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? , 2014, CSCW.

[25]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Initial experiences with small group discussions in MOOCs , 2014, L@S.

[26]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Engaging with massive online courses , 2014, WWW.

[27]  David R. Karger,et al.  Improving online class forums by seeding discussions and managing section size , 2014, L@S.

[28]  C. Werry.  Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat , 1996 .