Sensitization of transforming growth factor-β signaling by multiple peptides patterned on DNA nanostructures.

We report sensitization of a cellular signaling pathway by addition of functionalized DNA nanostructures. Signaling by transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) has been shown to be dependent on receptor clustering. By patterning a DNA nanostructure with closely spaced peptides that bind to TGFβ receptor, we observe increased sensitivity of NMuMG cells to TGFβ ligand. This is evidenced by translocation of secondary messenger proteins to the nucleus and stimulation of an inducible luciferase reporter at lower concentrations of TGFβ ligand. We believe this represents an important initial step toward realization of DNA as a self-assembling and biologically compatible material for use in tissue engineering and drug delivery.

[1]  Thomas H LaBean,et al.  Overview of DNA origami for molecular self-assembly. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[2]  H. Sleiman,et al.  DNA nanostructure serum stability: greater than the sum of its parts. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[3]  Qiao Jiang,et al.  Visualization of the intracellular location and stability of DNA origami with a label-free fluorescent probe. , 2012, Chemical communications.

[4]  J. Massagué TGFβ signalling in context , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[5]  Hao Yan,et al.  DNA origami as a carrier for circumvention of drug resistance. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  B. Sullenger,et al.  Increased anticoagulant activity of thrombin-binding DNA aptamers by nanoscale organization on DNA nanostructures. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[7]  Masayuki Endo,et al.  Single-molecule analysis using DNA origami. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  Tim Liedl,et al.  Cellular immunostimulation by CpG-sequence-coated DNA origami structures. , 2011, ACS nano.

[9]  H. Pei,et al.  Self-assembled multivalent DNA nanostructures for noninvasive intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides. , 2011, ACS nano.

[10]  Zhizhi Wang,et al.  Streptavidin and its biotin complex at atomic resolution. , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[11]  Dong-Ming Huang,et al.  Aptamer-conjugated DNA icosahedral nanoparticles as a carrier of doxorubicin for cancer therapy. , 2011, ACS nano.

[12]  L. Kiessling,et al.  Spatial control of cell fate using synthetic surfaces to potentiate TGF-β signaling , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  D. Meldrum,et al.  Stability of DNA origami nanoarrays in cell lysate. , 2011, Nano letters.

[14]  Faisal A. Aldaye,et al.  A structurally tunable DNA-based extracellular matrix. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  N. Seeman Nanomaterials based on DNA. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[16]  Jung-Won Keum,et al.  Enhanced resistance of DNA nanostructures to enzymatic digestion. , 2009, Chemical communications.

[17]  G. Braun,et al.  Cell-targeted self-assembled DNA nanostructures. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Thomas H. LaBean,et al.  Nanofabrication by DNA self-assembly , 2009 .

[19]  Chengde Mao,et al.  DNA nanotubes as combinatorial vehicles for cellular delivery. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[20]  R. Weiss,et al.  A universal RNAi-based logic evaluator that operates in mammalian cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Yoshito Ikada,et al.  Challenges in tissue engineering , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  P. Rothemund Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.