Anterior Release Internal Distraction and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Severe and Rigid Scoliosis

Study Design. Retrospective study. Objective. To report on the results of anterior release, posterior internal distraction (with or without further distraction), and subsequent posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. For severe and rigid scoliosis, conventional procedures, such as posterior instrumentation combined with an anterior release, enable limited correction. Posterior vertebral column resection brings better correction but with a high rate of neurological complications or intraoperative neurological events. Methods. A total of 15 patients with severe and rigid scoliosis who underwent anterior release, posterior internal distraction (with or without further distraction), and subsequent posterior spinal fusion were retrospectively reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The radiographical parameters were evaluated, and clinical records were reviewed. Results. The average number of anteriorly removed discs was 4.1. Average posterior fusion length comprised 14.3 vertebrae. Overall, internal distraction corrected the mean Cobb angle by 58.1% (from 105.1° to 44.2°) compared with the initial curve magnitude. The mean preoperative scoliosis of 105.1° was corrected to 27.5° (74.3% correction) at the most recent follow-up. The correction rate of the proximal thoracic and thoracolumbar or lumbar curves was 48.1% and 82.1%, respectively. The preoperative thoracic kyphosis of 62.3° was corrected to 33.8° at the most recent follow-up. The preoperative lumbar lordosis of −66.1° was corrected to −46.3° at the most recent follow-up. The mean preoperative coronal imbalance of 0.8 cm improved to 0.5 cm at the most recent follow-up, and sagittal imbalance of 0.3 cm improved to 0.2 cm. Transient dyspnea occurred in one patient after the initial surgery and subsequently resolved. Two patients complained of concave soft-tissue pain after the first distraction. There were no neurological complications. Conclusion. Anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and subsequent posterior spinal fusion provide an effective alternative for severe and rigid scoliosis. Level of Evidence: 4

[1]  L. Lenke,et al.  Complications After 147 Consecutive Vertebral Column Resections for Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity: A Multicenter Analysis , 2013, Spine.

[2]  L. Lenke,et al.  Vertebral Column Resection in Children With Neuromuscular Spine Deformity , 2012, Spine.

[3]  J. Yang,et al.  Posterior Multilevel Vertebral Osteotomy for Severe and Rigid Idiopathic and Nonidiopathic Kyphoscoliosis: A Further Experience With Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up , 2011, Spine.

[4]  Tao Li,et al.  Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Jingming Xie,et al.  One-stage and posterior approach for correction of moderate to severe scoliosis in adolescents associated with Chiari I malformation: is a prior suboccipital decompression always necessary? , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[6]  A. Alanay,et al.  Posterior Vertebral Column Resection in Severe Spinal Deformities: A Total of 102 Cases , 2011, Spine.

[7]  R. Betz,et al.  10 Biomechanics and Reduction of Scoliosis , 2011 .

[8]  L. Lenke,et al.  Efficacy of perioperative halo-gravity traction for treatment of severe scoliosis (≥100°) , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  L. Lenke,et al.  Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Severe Spinal Deformity , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  L. Lenke,et al.  Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Pediatric Deformity: Minimum Two-Year Follow-up of Thirty-Five Consecutive Patients , 2009, Spine.

[11]  Hae-Ryong Song,et al.  Posterior Multilevel Vertebral Osteotomy for Correction of Severe and Rigid Neuromuscular Scoliosis: A Preliminary Study , 2009, Spine.

[12]  Jianqiang Ni,et al.  Single‐staged anterior and posterior spinal fusion: A safe and effective alternative for severe and rigid adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in China , 2009, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[13]  C. Ames,et al.  VERTEBRAL COLUMN RESECTION FOR RIGID SPINAL DEFORMITY , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[14]  M. Tezer,et al.  Posterior Only Pedicle Screw Instrumentation With Intraoperative Halo-Femoral Traction in the Surgical Treatment of Severe Scoliosis (>100°) , 2008, Spine.

[15]  张国华.  Cantilever bending technique for treatment of large and rigid scoliosis , 2007 .

[16]  Jianxiong Shen,et al.  Comparison of 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Anterior and Posterior Spinal Fusion for Severe and Rigid Idiopathic Scoliosis–A Randomized Prospective Study , 2006, Spine.

[17]  J. Buchowski,et al.  Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  H. Halm,et al.  Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[19]  W. Choi,et al.  Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Rigid Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[20]  L. Lenke,et al.  Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis , 2005, Spine.

[21]  A. Crawford,et al.  Effectiveness of Spinal Release and Halo-Femoral Traction in the Management of Severe Spinal Deformity , 2003, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[22]  S. Suk,et al.  Posterior Vertebral Column Resection For Severe Spinal Deformities , 2002, Spine.

[23]  K. Kaneda,et al.  An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Study Investigating the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine , 2002, Spine.

[24]  H. Moriya,et al.  Vertebral decancellation for severe scoliosis. , 2000, Spine.

[25]  D. Bradford,et al.  Vertebral Column Resection for the Treatment of Rigid Coronal Decompensation , 1997, Spine.

[26]  H. Shufflebarger,et al.  Anterior and Posterior Spinal Fusion Staged Versus Same‐Day Surgery , 1991, Spine.

[27]  K. D. Leatherman.  The management of rigid spinal curves. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  G Elfström,et al.  Telemetry recordings of forces in the Harrington distraction rod: a method for increasing safety in the operative treatment of scoliosis patients. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.