Design and assessment of a low-cost, electromyographically controlled, prosthetic hand

The study reported here explored the design and realization of a low-cost, electromyographically controlled hand prosthesis for amputees living in developing countries. The developed prosthesis is composed of a light aluminum structure with opposing fingers connected to a DC motor that imparts only the movement of grasp. Problems associated with surface electromyographic signal acquisition and processing, motor control, and evaluation of grasp force were addressed, with the goal of minimizing cost and ensuring easy assembly. Simple analog front ends amplify and condition the electromyographic signals registered from two antagonist muscles by surface electrodes. Analog signals are sampled at 1 kHz and processed by a microcontroller that drives the motor with a supply voltage proportional to the muscular contraction, performing the opening and closing of the opposing fingers. Reliable measurements of the level of muscle contractions were obtained by specific digital processing: real-time operators implementing the root mean square value, mean absolute value, standard deviation, and mean absolute differential value were compared in terms of efficiency to estimate the EMG envelope, computational load, and time delay. The mean absolute value operator was adopted at a time window of 64 milliseconds. A suitable calibration procedure was proposed to overcome problems associated with the wide variation of electromyograph amplitude and background noise depending on the specific patient’s muscles selected. A pulse-width modulated signal drives the DC motor, allowing closing and opening of the prosthesis. The relationship between the motor-driver signal and the actual hand-grasp force developed by the prosthesis was measured using a hand-held grip dynamometer. The resulting force was proportional to current for moderate values of current and then saturated. The motor torque, and, in turn, the force elicited, can be measured by sensing the current absorbed by the motor. Therefore, the grasp force can be opportunely limited or controlled. The cost of the only electronic and mechanical components of the electromyographically controlled hand was about US$50; other costs, such as the cost of labor to assemble the prosthesis and the production of adapters for patients, were not estimated.

[1]  A. Fratini,et al.  Muscle motion and EMG activity in vibration treatment. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Robin M. Coupland Assistance for victims of anti-personnel mines: Needs, constraints and strategy , 2002 .

[3]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User–Prosthesis Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Bethany J Figg,et al.  National Institute of Child Health and Human Development , 2013 .

[5]  Blair A. Lock,et al.  Determining the Optimal Window Length for Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control: Balancing the Competing Effects of Classification Error and Controller Delay , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  S. Krishnan,et al.  Real-Time Classification of Forearm Electromyographic Signals Corresponding to User-Selected Intentional Movements for Multifunction Prosthesis Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Barbara Engstrom,et al.  Therapy for amputees , 1999 .

[10]  Alon Wolf,et al.  A fast implementation for EMG signal linear envelope computation. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[11]  Luca Citi,et al.  Decoding of grasping information from neural signals recorded using peripheral intrafascicular interfaces , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  André van Schaik,et al.  A new EEG recording system for passive dry electrodes , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Bracale,et al.  Study of the control strategy of the quadriceps muscles in anterior knee pain. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  Andrzej Wolczowski,et al.  Towards an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand Using a 3-D Electromagnetic Positioning System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  Paolo Dario,et al.  The Cyberhand: on the design of a cybernetic prosthetic hand intended to be interfaced to the peripheral nervous system , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[16]  Hong Liu,et al.  A Five-fingered Underactuated Prosthetic Hand System , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[17]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  N. Walsh,et al.  Rehabilitation of landmine victims--the ultimate challenge. , 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[20]  Maria Romano,et al.  Relevance of motion artifact in electromyography recordings during vibration treatment. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  J. Finsterer EMG-interference pattern analysis. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Maria Romano,et al.  An ultra-high input impedance ECG amplifier for long-term monitoring of athletes , 2010, Medical devices.

[24]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  D. Cummings,et al.  Prosthetics in the developing world: A review of the literature , 1996, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[26]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .