The Social Construction of Nuclear Community

ONKALO, the world’s first repository for the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel, is being constructed in Eurajoki, Finland. We study how the constructor of this facility portrays it to the local community in order to influence lay understanding of the disposal risk, build trust, and gain public approval for the construction project. The study is based on a framing analysis of the newsletters published by the constructor of the facility in 2000-2014. The results suggest that the nuclear industry has developed increasing understanding of the social and communal aspects of public resistance to nuclear power. To create trust and to increase acceptance locally the industry is socially constructing a nuclear community around the repository. The gap between the nuclear experts and the local residents is narrowed and the repository is portrayed as being a shared project within the local community advancing the common interests of the industry and the residents. This may represent a new trend in pronuclear storytelling.

[1]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information , 1989 .

[2]  Gregory E. McAvoy,et al.  Controlling Technocracy: Citizen Rationality and the NIMBY Syndrome , 1999 .

[3]  F. Pampel,et al.  Support for Nuclear Energy in the Context of Climate Change , 2011 .

[4]  The rationality of acceptance in a nuclear community: analysing residents' opinions on the expansion of the SNF repository in the municipality of Eurajoki, Finland , 2010 .

[5]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .

[6]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk , 1995 .

[7]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[8]  Diane Farseta.  The campaign to sell nuclear , 2008 .

[9]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 2011 .

[10]  L. Clarke.  Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster , 1999 .

[11]  Among Demons and Wizards: The Nuclear Energy Discourse in Sweden and the Re-Enchantment of the World , 2010 .

[12]  Arwen Mohun,et al.  The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons , 1993 .

[13]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  M. Douglas.  Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[15]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[16]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[17]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction , 2002 .

[18]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Burying Uncertainty: Risk and the Case Against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste , 1993 .

[19]  K. Boulding,et al.  The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. , 1956 .

[20]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  What's in a Frame? A Content Analysis of Media Framing Studies in the World's Leading Communication Journals, 1990-2005 , 2009 .

[21]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[22]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Framing, Reframing, and Issue Development , 1992 .

[23]  Michael S. Carolan,et al.  The Precautionary Principle and Traditional Risk Assessment , 2007 .

[24]  A. Catellani.  Pro-nuclear European discourses: Socio-semiotic observations , 2012 .

[25]  Matti Kojo,et al.  Nuclear community considering threats and benefits of final disposal. Local opinions regarding the spent nuclear fuel repository in Finland , 2012 .

[26]  Dorothy Nelkin,et al.  Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions , 1979 .

[27]  The Temporary Nature of Societal Risk Evaluation: Understanding the Finnish Nuclear Decisions , 2009 .

[28]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[29]  Barry D. Solomon,et al.  The international politics of nuclear waste , 1991 .

[30]  T. Guidotti,et al.  Aurum: a case study in the politics of NIMBY , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[31]  William J. Kinsella,et al.  Chapter Three: One Hundred Years of Nuclear Discourse: Four Master Themes and Their Implications for Environmental Communication , 2005 .

[32]  John F. Ahearne,et al.  Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology , 2002 .

[33]  R. Kasperson,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk , 2003 .

[34]  William A. Hatt,et al.  Nuclear fear: A history of images , 1989 .

[35]  D. Nelkin.  Nuclear Power and Its Critics; The Cayuga Lake Controversy. , 1971 .

[36]  A. Giddens.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[37]  Darrin Durant,et al.  Nuclear Waste Management in Canada: Critical Issues, Critical Perspectives , 2009 .

[38]  Lori A. Cramer,et al.  Rural Community Residents’ Views of Nuclear Waste Repository Siting in Nevada , 1993 .

[39]  M. Hedley,et al.  Framing ambiguity: insider/outsiders and the successful legitimation project of the socially responsible mutual fund industry , 2012 .

[40]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective , 2009 .

[41]  G. Bateson.  A theory of play and fantasy. , 1955 .

[42]  O. Ibitayo,et al.  Public-private partnerships in the siting of hazardous waste facilities: the importance of trust , 2002, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[43]  S. Walton.  Site the Mine in Our Backyard! Discursive Strategies of Community Stakeholders in an Environmental Conflict in New Zealand , 2007 .

[44]  J. Edwards,et al.  Rethinking Expertise , 2008 .

[45]  Gerald M. Steinberg,et al.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers . By Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982. Pp. 224. $14.95.) , 1984 .

[46]  David H. DeVorkin,et al.  Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance , 1990 .