H∞ and state-feedback controllers for vibration suppression in a single-link flexible robot

The demand on more efficient structures has increased the use of lightweight flexible structures in industrial applications. The main objective of this work is to suppress vibration at the free end of a single-link rotational robot subjected to fast movements. The control architecture is made up of two independent control loops; the first loop is employed to control the position of the hub and the second loop is used to attenuate the vibration of the arm. The position control of the hub is achieved through a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller with feedforward gains. The active vibration control (AVC) is achieved implementing two different controllers. An observer-based state-feedback controller and an H∞ suboptimal controller. These are used to damp the first resonance frequency of the system. A pair of piezoelectric patches is used as actuator. The system is considered as a cantilevered beam, and its model is obtained using black box system identification techniques. The inertial force induced by the movement is considered for the second loop as a transient disturbance at the measure point. The arm with a payload is subjected to different joint trajectories, which excites the free vibration mode of the arm at the end of the movement. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the observer-based state-feedback controller and suboptimal H∞ controllers for the rejection of this unwanted vibration. The controllers are capable of suppressing the disturbance in a short period of time.

[1]  Mohd Ashraf Ahmad,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Feedforward Control Schemes of a Flexible Robot Manipulator System , 2008 .

[2]  Harry E. Stephanou,et al.  Optimal control of a single-link flexible manipulator , 1989, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[3]  Jian-Xin Xu,et al.  Controller design for a single-link flexible smart materials robot with experimental tests , 1998, Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171).

[4]  Juan Fernando,et al.  Modeling and Tip Position Control of a Flexible Link Robot: Experimental Results Modelación y Control de Posición del Extremo de un Robot de Eslabón Flexible: Resultados Experimentales , 2009 .

[5]  Manu Sharma,et al.  Optimization Criteria for Optimal Placement of Piezoelectric Sensors and Actuators on a Smart Structure: A Technical Review , 2010 .

[6]  Christian Bohn,et al.  Experimental evaluation of an LPV-gain-scheduled observer for rejecting multisine disturbances with time-varying frequencies , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[7]  Soo Hong Park,et al.  Active vibration control of flexible cantilever beam using piezo actuator and Filtered-X LMS algorithm , 1998 .

[8]  Santiago Garrido,et al.  Ingeniería de control: modelado, análisis y control de sistemas dinámicos , 2003 .

[9]  Juan Fernando Peza-Solís,et al.  Modeling and Tip Position Control of a Flexible Link Robot: Experimental Results , 2009, Computación y Sistemas.

[10]  Seung-bok Choi,et al.  Quantitative feedback theory control of a single-link flexible manipulator featuring piezoelectric actuator and sensor , 1999 .

[11]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Model-free controllers of a single-link smart material robot , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[12]  S. C. Saini,et al.  Comparison of Pole Placement and LQR Applied to Single Link Flexible Manipulator , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies.

[13]  Christian Bohn,et al.  An LPV discrete-time controller for the rejection of harmonic time-varying disturbances in a lightweight flexible structure , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[14]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FLEXIBLE MANIPULATORS, A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2006 .

[15]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control , 1994 .