Relationship of Tricuspid Repair at the Time of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Survival

Purpose Tricuspid regurgitation contributes to right ventricular failure (RVF) and is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) treatment. However, whether tricuspid valve repair (TVR) at the time of LVAD implantation improves outcomes is not clear. Methods We identified all patients undergoing initial implantation of a long-term continuous-flow LVAD at our institution from March 2006 to August 2011. We assessed the impact of TVR on survival and incidence of RVF using Kaplan-Meier curves and proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, gender, baseline tricuspid regurgitation, RV function, MELD score, albumin, and indication (bridge vs. destination). Results A total of 101 patients were included in the analysis, of which 14 patients underwent TVR concomitant LVAD. All TVR patients had moderate or severe baseline regurgitation. Crude survival was not different between groups. In multivariable models adjusted for confounding factors, TVR showed a significant association with improved survival (HR = 0.1, p = 0.049). Adjusted models showed no difference in RVF. Conclusions In this cohort of patients, TVR at the time of LVAD implantation appears associated with better survival. Additional larger studies are needed to verify the effect of TVR at the time of LVAD implantation, and whether it should be utilized more frequently.

[1]  M. Stafford-Smith,et al.  Utility of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures for patients undergoing implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular device. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  J. Stulak,et al.  Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Repair or Replacement During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant Demonstrates Comparable Outcomes in the Long Term , 2012, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[3]  E. Potapov,et al.  Impact of tricuspid valve annulus dilation on mid-term survival after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. , 2012, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  M. Swaminathan,et al.  Clinical impact of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures during left ventricular assist device implantation. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  M. Swaminathan,et al.  Impact of tricuspid valve regurgitation in patients treated with implantable left ventricular assist devices. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  E. McGee,et al.  Tricuspid valve repair with left ventricular assist device implantation: is it warranted? , 2011, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  F. Pagani,et al.  Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  S. Russell,et al.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  F. Pagani,et al.  Low Operative Mortality With Implantation of a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device and Impact of Concurrent Cardiac Procedures , 2009, Circulation.

[10]  Jong-Min Song,et al.  Factors associated with development of late significant tricuspid regurgitation after successful left-sided valve surgery , 2009, Heart.

[11]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Tricuspid incompetence and geometry of the right ventricle as predictors of right ventricular function after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. , 2008, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  Andrew Boyle,et al.  Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  O H Frazier,et al.  Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Robert J Cody,et al.  Prognostic significance of mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. , 2002, American heart journal.

[15]  M. Oz,et al.  Surgical management of valvular disease in patients requiring left ventricular assist device support. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  J. Kirklin,et al.  Influence of longer term left ventricular assist device support on valvular regurgitation. , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[17]  D. Adams,et al.  Liberal use of tricuspid-valve annuloplasty during left-ventricular assist device implantation. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  Yoshifumi Naka,et al.  Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. , 2006, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.