Lower mortality following pulmonary adverse events and sepsis with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in the PLATO study

Abstract In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study of patients with acute coronary syndromes, ticagrelor reduced mortality compared to clopidogrel but the mechanisms for this mortality reduction remain uncertain. We analysed adverse events (AEs) consistent with either pulmonary infection or sepsis, and subsequent mortality, in 18,421 PLATO patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. AEs occurring within 7 days of last dose of study medication were defined as “on-treatment”. Serial measurements of blood leukocyte counts, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were performed. Fewer on-treatment pulmonary AEs occurred in the ticagrelor compared to the clopidogrel group (275 vs. 331 respectively; p = 0.019), with fewer deaths following these AEs (33 vs. 71; p < 0.001), particularly in those who remained on study medication three days after AE onset (10 vs. 43; p < 0.001). There were fewer deaths attributed to sepsis in the ticagrelor group (7 vs. 23; p = 0.003). Leukocyte counts were lower in the clopidogrel group during treatment (p < 0.0001 at 1, 3 and 6 months) but not at 1 month post-discontinuation. C-reactive protein increased more at discharge in the ticagrelor group (28.0 ± 38.0 vs. 26.1 ± 36.6 mg/l; p < 0.001) and interleukin-6 remained higher during the first month of treatment with ticagrelor. We conclude that the mortality risk following pulmonary AEs and sepsis in acute coronary syndrome patients appears to be lower during ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel therapy. Further work should assess whether ticagrelor and clopidogrel have differential effects on immune signalling.

[1]  H. Thorlacius,et al.  Ticagrelor reduces neutrophil recruitment and lung damage in abdominal sepsis , 2013, Platelets.

[2]  J. Winning,et al.  Effects of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and atherosclerotic vascular diseases on the outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock , 2013, Platelets.

[3]  N. Deshpande,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization , 2013 .

[4]  G. Brandrup-Wognsen,et al.  Ticagrelor enhances adenosine-induced coronary vasodilatory responses in humans. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Libby,et al.  Inflammatory Biomarkers, Death, and Recurrent Nonfatal Coronary Events After an Acute Coronary Syndrome in the MIRACL Study , 2013, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[6]  R. Charnigo,et al.  Clopidogrel treatment and the incidence and severity of community acquired pneumonia in a cohort study and meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy in pneumonia and critical illness , 2013, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[7]  C. Held,et al.  Factors contributing to the lower mortality with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Sidaway,et al.  Ticagrelor Inhibits Adenosine Uptake In Vitro and Enhances Adenosine-Mediated Hyperemia Responses in a Canine Model , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[9]  K. Ley,et al.  Regulation of Neutrophil Function by Adenosine , 2012, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[10]  C. Cannon,et al.  CONSISTENT BENEFIT OF TICAGRELOR COMPARED TO CLOPIDOGREL IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME PATIENTS REGARDLESS OF BASELINE INFLAMMATORY MARKERS , 2012 .

[11]  C. Cannon,et al.  Characterization of dyspnoea in PLATO study patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel and its association with clinical outcomes. , 2011, European heart journal.

[12]  M. Gianni,et al.  Neutrophils and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or cardiac revascularisation , 2011, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[13]  S. Watson,et al.  Platelets and the innate immune system: mechanisms of bacterial‐induced platelet activation , 2011, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[14]  P. Pais,et al.  The incidence of bradyarrhythmias and clinical bradyarrhythmic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial: results of the continuous electrocardiographic assessment substudy. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  A. Nurden Platelets, inflammation and tissue regeneration , 2011, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[16]  C. Cannon,et al.  Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Incidence of dyspnea and assessment of cardiac and pulmonary function in patients with stable coronary artery disease receiving ticagrelor, clopidogrel, or placebo in the ONSET/OFFSET study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  C. Cannon,et al.  THE INCIDENCE OF ARRHYTHMIAS AND CLINICAL ARRHYTHMIC EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES TREATED WITH TICAGRELOR OR CLOPIDOGREL IN THE PLATO TRIAL , 2010 .

[19]  M. Bauer,et al.  Antiplatelet drugs and outcome in mixed admissions to an intensive care unit* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[20]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Bauer,et al.  Beneficial effect of clopidogrel in a mouse model of polymicrobial sepsis , 2009, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[22]  A. Sharrett,et al.  Aspirin plus clopidogrel and risk of infection after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  A. Skene,et al.  Comparison of ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[24]  D. Evans,et al.  Platelet P2Y12 Receptor Influences the Vessel Wall Response to Arterial Injury and Thrombosis , 2009, Circulation.

[25]  M. Bauer,et al.  Anti-platelet drugs and outcome in severe infection: Clinical impact and underlying mechanisms , 2009, Platelets.

[26]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  S. Balamuthusamy,et al.  Hematologic Adverse Effects of Clopidogrel , 2007, American journal of therapeutics.

[28]  R. Storey Biology and pharmacology of the platelet P2Y12 receptor. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[29]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[30]  R. Califf,et al.  Usefulness of biomarkers for predicting long-term mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (a GUSTO IV substudy). , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  R. Collins,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[32]  P. Ridker,et al.  C-reactive protein comes of age , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[33]  K. Reinhart,et al.  Platelet and Leukocyte Activation Correlate with the Severity of Septic Organ Dysfunction , 2002, Shock.

[34]  K. Ray Abciximab suppresses the rise in levels of circulating inflammatory markers after percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 2002, Circulation.

[35]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .