The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder.

To determine the effects of age, sex, and arm dominance on shoulder range of motion, we measured active and passive forward elevation, abduction, internal and external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction, external rotation with the arm adducted, and extension bilaterally in 280 subjects ranging in age from 4 to 70 years. Linear regression analyses were performed for all motions except forward elevation. This motion, which showed a nonlinear pattern of decline with age, was evaluated with 3-way analysis of variance. Shoulder range of motion decreased with age for all measured motions with the exception of internal rotation, which increased with age. Female subjects had a significantly greater range of motion than male subjects for all motions measured. Dominant arms displayed significantly greater external rotation than nondominant, regardless of whether the arm was abducted or adducted at the time of measurement. However, nondominant shoulders demonstrated significantly greater internal rotation and extension than dominant. No significant differences were found between dominant and nondominant sides for forward elevation or abduction.

[1]  L. Bigliani,et al.  Shoulder Motion and Laxity in the Professional Baseball Player , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  S. Seber,et al.  Normal Range of Motion of the Joints of the Upper Extremity in Male Subjects, with Special Reference to Side* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J M Rothstein,et al.  Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Shoulder measurements. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[4]  S. Azen,et al.  Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  T. Ellenbecker,et al.  Glenohumeral joint internal and external rotation range of motion in elite junior tennis players. , 1996, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[6]  M. Moore,et al.  The measurement of joint motion; the technic of goniometry. , 1949, The Physical therapy review.

[7]  O. J. Björnsson,et al.  Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: a comparison between two populations. , 1974, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  M. Kronberg,et al.  Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Mayerson Nh,et al.  Goniometric measurement reliability in physical medicine. , 1984 .

[10]  J. M. Rothstein,et al.  Goniometric Reliability in a Clinical Setting , 1983 .

[11]  P J Nichols,et al.  Preliminary studies in measuring range of motion in normal and painful stiff shoulders. , 1975, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[12]  G R Johnson,et al.  Ranges of movement at the shoulder complex using an electromagnetic movement sensor. , 1991, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  Margaret L. Moore.  The Measurement of Joint Motion: Part II: The Technic of Goniometry , 1949 .

[14]  S. Azen,et al.  Reliability of goniometric measurements. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[15]  J S Torg,et al.  A preliminary study on the measurement of static and dynamic motion at the glenohumeral joint , 1986, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  J. D. Priest,et al.  Upper extremity range of motion, grip strength, and girth in highly skilled tennis players. , 1974, Physical therapy.

[17]  Murray Mp,et al.  Shoulder motion and muscle strength of normal men and women in two age groups. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  T. Chandler,et al.  Flexibility comparisons of junior elite tennis players to other athletes , 1990, The American journal of sports medicine.