Performance of Synchrophasor Estimators in Transient Conditions: A Comparative Analysis

Transient amplitude or phase changes in current or voltage waveforms may seriously affect synchrophasor estimator's accuracy and responsiveness. The IEEE Standard C37.118.1-2011 specifies test conditions as well as accuracy and response delay limits for different types of disturbances. In this paper, the performances of three state-of-the-art techniques based on phasor Taylor's series expansion specifically conceived to track phasors in dynamic conditions are analyzed and compared with the one-cycle discrete Fourier transform estimator under the effect of amplitude step changes, phase step changes, and linear frequency variations. Several simulation results show that the total vector error (TVE) tends to increase linearly with the step size. However, the peak TVE increments for a given step size are quite similar for all the considered techniques and are dominated by amplitude or phase errors, depending on whether the step affects the waveform amplitude or its phase, respectively. In this paper, the response times of the considered estimators for two different TVE thresholds are also analyzed and compared as a function of the step size, to assess their compliance to the requirements of the standard. Further simulation results show that in the case of linear frequency variations, responsiveness is not an issue and the TVE values of all estimators lie within the same worst case boundaries as those related to the case of static off-nominal frequency offsets.

[1]  Zhaosheng Teng,et al.  Harmonic Phasor Analysis Based on Improved FFT Algorithm , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Phasor and Frequency Estimates Through Maximally Flat Differentiators , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  B. Kasztenny,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Synchrophasor Estimator Capable of Measurements Under Dynamic Conditions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[4]  D. Macii,et al.  Accuracy of one-cycle DFT-based synchrophasor estimators in steady-state and dynamic conditions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Tevfik Sezi,et al.  Considerations about synchrophasors measurement in dynamic system conditions , 2009 .

[6]  Yuanzhang Sun,et al.  A practical method to improve phasor and power measurement accuracy of DFT algorithm , 2006 .

[7]  D. Petri,et al.  Accuracy of the synchrophasor estimator provided by the interpolated DFT algorithm , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[8]  R.E. Brown,et al.  Impact of Smart Grid on distribution system design , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[9]  Paolo Castello,et al.  Impact of the Model on the Accuracy of Synchrophasor Measurement , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Christian Riesch,et al.  IEEE 1588 for time synchronization of devices in the electric power industry , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication.

[11]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Phasor Estimates for Power System Oscillations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Magnus Akke,et al.  Sample Value Adjustment Improves Phasor Estimation at Off-Nominal Frequencies , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Synchronized Phasor Measurement Applications in Power Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  M. Lixia,et al.  Adaptive Taylor-Fourier synchrophasor estimation for fast response to changing conditions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[15]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Dynamic Harmonic Analysis Through Taylor–Fourier Transform , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Transient behavior of the full-cycle DFT Phasor Estimator , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS).

[17]  Dario Petri,et al.  Accuracy Analysis and Enhancement of DFT-Based Synchrophasor Estimators in Off-Nominal Conditions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[18]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  Synchronized Phasor and Frequency Measurement Under Transient Conditions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[19]  Dario Petri,et al.  Effect of transient conditions on DFT-based synchrophasor estimator performance , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS) Proceedings.

[20]  W.A. Mittelstadt,et al.  Use of the WECC WAMS in Wide-Area Probing Tests for Validation of System Performance and Modeling , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  D. Petri,et al.  An improved dynamic synchrophasor estimator , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON).

[22]  Farrokh Albuyeh,et al.  Grid of the future , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[23]  Dario Petri,et al.  Synchrophasor Estimators Accuracy: A Comparative Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.