Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models

Abstract. The effective radiative forcing, which includes the instantaneous forcing plus adjustments from the atmosphere and surface, has emerged as the key metric of evaluating human and natural influence on the climate. We evaluate effective radiative forcing and adjustments in 17 contemporary climate models that are participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and have contributed to the Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP). Present-day (2014) global-mean anthropogenic forcing relative to pre-industrial (1850) levels from climate models stands at 2.00 (±0.23) W m−2, comprised of 1.81 (±0.09) W m−2 from CO2, 1.08 (± 0.21) W m−2 from other well-mixed greenhouse gases, −1.01 (± 0.23) W m−2 from aerosols and −0.09 (±0.13) W m−2 from land use change. Quoted uncertainties are 1 standard deviation across model best estimates, and 90 % confidence in the reported forcings, due to internal variability, is typically within 0.1 W m−2. The majority of the remaining 0.21 W m−2 is likely to be from ozone. In most cases, the largest contributors to the spread in effective radiative forcing (ERF) is from the instantaneous radiative forcing (IRF) and from cloud responses, particularly aerosol–cloud interactions to aerosol forcing. As determined in previous studies, cancellation of tropospheric and surface adjustments means that the stratospherically adjusted radiative forcing is approximately equal to ERF for greenhouse gas forcing but not for aerosols, and consequentially, not for the anthropogenic total. The spread of aerosol forcing ranges from −0.63 to −1.37 W m−2, exhibiting a less negative mean and narrower range compared to 10 CMIP5 models. The spread in 4×CO2 forcing has also narrowed in CMIP6 compared to 13 CMIP5 models. Aerosol forcing is uncorrelated with climate sensitivity. Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest that the increasing spread in climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models, particularly related to high-sensitivity models, is a consequence of a stronger negative present-day aerosol forcing and little evidence that modelling groups are systematically tuning climate sensitivity or aerosol forcing to recreate observed historical warming.

[1]  M. Dix,et al.  Configuration and spin-up of ACCESS-CM2, the new generation Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator Coupled Model , 2020, Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science.

[2]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  The HadGEM3-GA7.1 radiative kernel: the importance of a well-resolved stratosphere , 2020 .

[3]  S. Yukimoto,et al.  Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0 , 2020, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science.

[4]  Carlos A. Cruz,et al.  GISS‐E2.1: Configurations and Climatology , 2020, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[5]  S. Bony,et al.  Presentation and Evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Climate Model , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[6]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Biases in the albedo sensitivity to deforestation in CMIP5 models and their impacts on the associated historical radiative forcing , 2020, Earth System Dynamics.

[7]  M. Mills,et al.  Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[8]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2020, Reviews of geophysics.

[9]  C. Heinze,et al.  The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM2 – Evaluation of theCMIP6 DECK and historical simulations , 2020 .

[10]  N. Abraham,et al.  Assessment of pre-industrial to present-day anthropogenic climate forcing in UKESM1 , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  W. G. Strand,et al.  The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[12]  Masaharu Yoshioka,et al.  Constraining Uncertainty in Aerosol Direct Forcing , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[13]  L. Lee,et al.  Radiative forcing of climate change from the Copernicus reanalysis of atmospheric composition , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[14]  T. Mauritsen,et al.  On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recent coupled model ensembles , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[15]  K. Taylor,et al.  Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[16]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates , 2019, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[17]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  The HadGEM3-GA7.1 radiative kernel: the importance of a well-resolved stratosphere , 2020 .

[18]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  Separating radiative forcing by aerosol–cloud interactions and rapid cloud adjustments in the ECHAM–HAMMOZ aerosol–climate model using the method of partial radiative perturbations , 2019 .

[19]  T. Andrews,et al.  Efficacy of Climate Forcings in PDRMIP Models , 2019, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[20]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[21]  T. Andrews,et al.  Forcings, Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity in HadGEM3‐GC3.1 and UKESM1 , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[22]  A. J. Hewitt,et al.  UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[23]  R. Waldman,et al.  Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[24]  J. von Hardenberg,et al.  On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6 , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[25]  Shian-Jiann Lin,et al.  Structure and Performance of GFDL's CM4.0 Climate Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[26]  N. Gillett,et al.  The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[27]  J. Haywood,et al.  Are Changes in Atmospheric Circulation Important for Black Carbon Aerosol Impacts on Clouds, Precipitation, and Radiation? , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[28]  H. Douville,et al.  Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM‐CM6‐1 , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[29]  Philip W. Jones,et al.  The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[30]  H. Tsujino,et al.  The Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model Version 2.0, MRI-ESM2.0: Description and Basic Evaluation of the Physical Component , 2019, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II.

[31]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Observationally constrained aerosol–cloud semi-direct effects , 2019, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[32]  T. Andrews,et al.  Comparison of Effective Radiative Forcing Calculations Using Multiple Methods, Drivers, and Models , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[33]  Alexander J. Winkler,et al.  Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2 , 2019, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[34]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The GFDL Earth System Model version 4 . 1 ( GFDL-ESM 4 . 1 ) : Model 1 description and simulation characteristics 2 3 , 2019 .

[35]  K. Calvin,et al.  Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[36]  T. Andrews,et al.  Understanding Rapid Adjustments to Diverse Forcing Agents , 2018, Geophysical research letters.

[37]  A. Kirkevåg,et al.  A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[38]  W. Collins,et al.  Reducing uncertainties in climate models , 2018, Science.

[39]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[40]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[41]  A. Kirkevåg,et al.  A production-tagged aerosol module for Earth system models, OsloAero5.3 – extensions and updates for CAM5.3-Oslo , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[42]  Loeb,et al.  Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product , 2018 .

[43]  B. Soden,et al.  WATER VAPOR FEEDBACK AND GLOBAL WARMING , 2018 .

[44]  N. Gillett,et al.  The influence of non-CO2 forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets , 2018 .

[45]  D. N. Walters,et al.  The Met Office Global Coupled Model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) Configurations , 2017 .

[46]  T. Andrews,et al.  Rapid Adjustments Cause Weak Surface Temperature Response to Increased Black Carbon Concentrations , 2017, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[47]  P. Forster,et al.  A real-time Global Warming Index , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[48]  F. Vitt,et al.  Surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative feedback kernels for CESM-CAM5 , 2017 .

[49]  T. Mauritsen,et al.  On the sensitivity of anthropogenic aerosol forcing to model‐internal variability and parameterizing a Twomey effect , 2017 .

[50]  S. Klein,et al.  Low-Cloud Feedbacks from Cloud-Controlling Factors: A Review , 2017, Surveys in Geophysics.

[51]  T. Andrews,et al.  PDRMIP: A Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project, Protocol and preliminary results. , 2017, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[52]  Meng Li,et al.  Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) , 2017 .

[53]  B. Stevens,et al.  MACv2-SP: a parameterization of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect for use in CMIP6 , 2017 .

[54]  K. Armour.  Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks , 2017 .

[55]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 , 2017 .

[56]  Chris D. Jones,et al.  Effective radiative forcing from historical land use change , 2017, Climate Dynamics.

[57]  G. Myhre,et al.  Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing , 2016 .

[58]  Stefan Reimann,et al.  Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6) , 2016 .

[59]  T. Andrews,et al.  Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[60]  Robert Pincus,et al.  The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): Experimental Protocol for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[61]  J. Lamarque,et al.  AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6 , 2016 .

[62]  D. Higdon,et al.  Indirect Aerosol Effect Increases CMIP5 Models' Projected Arctic Warming , 2016 .

[63]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[64]  T. Andrews,et al.  The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO2 , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[65]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Radiative flux and forcing parameterization error in aerosol‐free clear skies , 2015, Geophysical research letters.

[66]  B. Soden,et al.  An assessment of methods for computing radiative forcing in climate models , 2015 .

[67]  K. Taylor,et al.  Quantifying components of aerosol‐cloud‐radiation interactions in climate models , 2014 .

[68]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate Change , 2014 .

[69]  William M. Putman,et al.  Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive , 2014 .

[70]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[71]  T. Mauritsen,et al.  Forcing and feedback in the MPI‐ESM‐LR coupled model under abruptly quadrupled CO2 , 2013 .

[72]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Clouds and Aerosols , 2013 .

[73]  S. Ghan.  Technical Note: Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing , 2013 .

[74]  Yi Huang.  On the Longwave Climate Feedbacks , 2013 .

[75]  M. Huber,et al.  State-dependent climate sensitivity in past warm climates and its implications for future climate projections , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  Benjamin M. Sanderson,et al.  Climate Feedbacks in CCSM3 under Changing CO2 Forcing. Part II: Variation of Climate Feedbacks and Sensitivity with Forcing , 2013 .

[77]  S. Bony,et al.  On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[78]  T. Andrews,et al.  Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models , 2013 .

[79]  M. Watanabe,et al.  On the robustness of tropospheric adjustment in CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[80]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Estimates of aerosol radiative forcing from the MACC re-analysis , 2012 .

[81]  Mark D. Zelinka,et al.  Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part II: Attribution to Changes in Cloud Amount, Altitude, and Optical Depth , 2012 .

[82]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[83]  I. Held,et al.  Using Relative Humidity as a State Variable in Climate Feedback Analysis , 2012 .

[84]  Stephen A. Klein,et al.  Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part I: Cloud Radiative Kernels , 2012 .

[85]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .

[86]  B. Mcavaney,et al.  Climate feedbacks under a very broad range of forcing , 2009 .

[87]  Brian J. Soden,et al.  Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels , 2008 .

[88]  Karen M. Shell,et al.  Using the Radiative Kernel Technique to Calculate Climate Feedbacks in NCAR's Community Atmospheric Model , 2008 .

[89]  Jeffrey T. Kiehl,et al.  Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity , 2007 .

[90]  K. Taylor,et al.  Estimating shortwave radiative forcing and response in climate models , 2007 .

[91]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[92]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[93]  B. Soden,et al.  WATER VAPOR FEEDBACK AND GLOBAL WARMING 1 , 2003 .

[94]  Manoj Joshi,et al.  An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms , 2003 .

[95]  R. Sausen,et al.  Contributions of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing to Recent Tropopause Height Changes , 2003, Science.

[96]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[97]  R. Betts.  Biogeophysical impacts of land use on present‐day climate: near‐surface temperature change and radiative forcing , 2001 .

[98]  R. Betts.  Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo , 2000, Nature.

[99]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .

[100]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes , 1997 .

[101]  A. Slingo,et al.  Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model , 1996 .

[102]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) , 1995 .

[103]  B. Albrecht.  Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[104]  S. Twomey.  The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .

[105]  Stevens,et al.  CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6 , 2017 .