Critical Factors in the User Environment: An Experimental Study of Users, Organizations and Tasks

This study investigates the characteristics of end users within the context of their environments. End users are defined as those persons who interact with a computer as part of their job but are not programmers or analysts. The Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS) developed by Greg Oldham and J. Richard Hackman, is appfied to 84 end users in 15 companies to discern 1) if there is a need for work redesign in the user environment; and 2) if there are problems specific to any part of the user environment. The results are compared with estabfished norms for various categories of workers and show that. end users generally perceive their jobs to be more highly motivating than do most workers. However, managers who utilize computers are not finding their jobs to be much more significant or meaningful than an average manager. Additionally, people utilizing the computer on a regular basis are experiencing boredom from a lack of interpersonal relationships. Solutions must be sought through work redesign.

[1]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[2]  D. Bell.  The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF UNCERTAINTY IN THE ENVIRONMENT TO INFORMATION USED BY DECISION MAKERS , 1975 .

[4]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[5]  G. Dickson,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems: An Exploratory Investigation , 1982 .

[6]  David Targett,et al.  Statistics for Modern Business Decisions , 1984 .

[7]  Carter Goodrich.  Economic Development of the North Atlantic Community: Historical Introduction to Modern Economics , 1968 .

[8]  G. Huber.  Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[9]  Edward J. Lusk,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Style and Report Format on Task Performance: The MIS Design Consequences , 1979 .

[10]  Kate M. Kaiser,et al.  User-Analyst Differences: An Empirical Investigation of Attitudes Related to Systems Development1 , 1982 .

[11]  Alexander M. Maish.  A User's Behavior Toward His MIS , 1979, MIS Q..

[12]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know , 1984, CACM.

[13]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Systems Quality, User Reactions, and the Use of Information Systems. , 1974 .

[14]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Concepts, Theory, and Techniques: FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERCEIVED UTILIZATION OF COMPUTER-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN THE OIL INDUSTRY , 1982 .

[15]  Stephen G. Peitchinis.  Computer technology and employment : retrospect and prospect , 1983 .

[16]  David H. Benson.  A Field Study of End User Computing: Findings and Issues , 1983, MIS Q..

[17]  Pierre Miret.  The Modernization of a Refinery: Its Influence on Men, Their Work and Structures , 1982 .

[18]  Gerardine L DeSanctis,et al.  An examination of an expectancy theory model of decision support system use , 1982 .

[19]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[20]  J. Hackman,et al.  NORMS FOR THE JOB DIAGNOSTIC SURVEY , 1978 .

[21]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1982 .

[22]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[23]  L. Greiner.  Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow , 1997 .

[24]  C. H. Kriebel.  Management information systems , 1970, ACM '70.

[25]  Robert I. Benjamin,et al.  Information Technology in the 1990s: A Long Range Planning Scenario , 1982, MIS Q..

[26]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[27]  R. F. Powers,et al.  An empirical investigation of selected hypotheses related to the success of management information system projects , 1971 .

[28]  John F. Rockart,et al.  The management of end user computing , 1983, CACM.

[29]  R. Hill.  The Coming Of Post Industrial Society , 1974 .