Optimisation of the size variation threshold for imaging evaluation of response in patients with platinum-refractory advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium treated with vinflunine.

BACKGROUND Vinflunine (VFL) has been approved in the European Union for second-line treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract (TCCU) in patients who progress after a platinum based regimen. However, very few patients achieve response by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Therefore, another 'response' threshold may be more useful than RECIST 1.0 in this setting. METHODS One hundred and seventy nine patients with advanced TCCU treated with second-line VFL therapy had chest Computed Tomography (CT) and abdominal/pelvic CT or MRI performed at baseline and at first follow-up (6 weeks ± 3 days) after therapy initiation. Tumour measurements and response by RECIST 1.0 were correlated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were then used to determine the optimal size threshold to define 'responders'. Impact of adverse prognostic factors including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) >0, Hb <10 g/dL, and liver metastases was analysed. RESULTS Tumour response included 13 partial responses (PR) by RECIST 1.0 and 52 patients with ≥ 10% decrease in the sum of longest diameters. Responders by RECIST 1.0 did not have a statistically significant improvement in OS, while patients with sum long axis diameter (SLD) reduction of ≥ 10% had a longer OS than those with SLD reduction of <10%: 11.3 versus 6.9 months (log rank p=0.0224). ROC analysis yielded ≥ 10% decrease in SLD as the optimal size change correlating with OS. These results persisted on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION In the study population, a ≥ 10% reduction in SLD at first follow-up imaging is a better early predictor of outcome than RECIST.

[1]  S. Culine,et al.  Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone after a platinum-containing regimen in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Shetal N Shah,et al.  Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Witjes,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapy in advanced urinary bladder cancer with fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[4]  J. Haanen,et al.  Choi response criteria for early prediction of clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[6]  D. Theodorescu,et al.  Personalized medicine in advanced urothelial cancer: when to treat, how to treat and who to treat. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[7]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapy with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with regionally metastatic or unresectable bladder cancer. , 2006, European urology.

[8]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Optimizing the size variation threshold for the CT evaluation of response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  Vicky Goh,et al.  CT response assessment combining reduction in both size and arterial phase density correlates with time to progression in metastatic renal cancer patients treated with targeted therapies , 2010, Cancer biology & therapy.

[10]  Haesun Choi,et al.  We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 minutes. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[14]  S. Culine,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. Jeong,et al.  Pretreatment assessment of tumor enhancement on contrast‐enhanced computed tomography as a potential predictor of treatment outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving antiangiogenic therapy , 2010, Cancer.

[16]  Shetal N Shah,et al.  Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Combination of multiple molecular markers can improve prognostication in patients with locally advanced and lymph node positive bladder cancer. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[18]  J. Capala,et al.  ‘Image and treat’: an individualized approach to urological tumors , 2010, Current opinion in oncology.

[19]  Haesun Choi,et al.  Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  K. Kihara,et al.  Initial experience of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess therapeutic response to induction chemoradiotherapy against muscle-invasive bladder cancer. , 2010, Urology.