Assessing species biomass contributions in microbial communities via metaproteomics

Microbial community structure can be analyzed by quantifying cell numbers or by quantifying biomass for individual populations. Methods for quantifying cell numbers are already available (e.g., fluorescence in situ hybridization, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing), yet high-throughput methods for assessing community structure in terms of biomass are lacking. Here we present metaproteomics-based methods for assessing microbial community structure using protein abundance as a measure for biomass contributions of individual populations. We optimize the accuracy and sensitivity of the method using artificially assembled microbial communities and show that it is less prone to some of the biases found in sequencing-based methods. We apply the method to communities from two different environments, microbial mats from two alkaline soda lakes, and saliva from multiple individuals. We show that assessment of species biomass contributions adds an important dimension to the analysis of microbial community structure.Convenient methods for assessing microbial community structure in terms of biomass are lacking. Here, the authors present a metaproteomics-based approach for assessing microbial community structure using protein abundance as a measure for biomass contributions of individual populations.

[1]  H. Bremer,et al.  Establishment of exponential growth after a nutritional shift-up in Escherichia coli B/r: accumulation of deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid, and protein , 1977, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  F. Azam,et al.  Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria , 1989 .

[3]  S. Oliver,et al.  Growth rate control of protein and nucleic acid content in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Escherichia coli B/r. , 1996, Microbiology.

[4]  Trevor C. Charles,et al.  Polyphasic microbial community analysis of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils from two northern Canadian communities. , 2000, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[5]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..

[7]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[8]  Vincent J. Denef,et al.  Implications of strain- and species-level sequence divergence for community and isolate shotgun proteomic analysis. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[9]  R. Amann,et al.  Single-cell identification in microbial communities by improved fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[10]  H. Daims Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and the daime image analysis program for the cultivation-independent quantification of microorganisms in environmental and medical samples. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[11]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Statistical design of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  M. Wagner Single-cell ecophysiology of microbes as revealed by Raman microspectroscopy or secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging. , 2009, Annual review of microbiology.

[13]  C. Eyers Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis , 2009 .

[14]  S. Hallam,et al.  Microbial community dynamics in a seasonally anoxic fjord: Saanich Inlet, British Columbia. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[15]  Griffin M. Weber,et al.  BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Wen-Han Yu,et al.  The Human Oral Microbiome Database: a web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information , 2010, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[17]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Efficient marginalization to compute protein posterior probabilities from shotgun mass spectrometry data. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[18]  M. Grube,et al.  Structure and function of the symbiosis partners of the lung lichen (Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm.) analyzed by metaproteomics , 2011, Proteomics.

[19]  Anders F. Andersson,et al.  Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[20]  Edward C. Uberbacher,et al.  Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences , 2012, Bioinform..

[21]  Sergey I. Nikolenko,et al.  SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing , 2012, J. Comput. Biol..

[22]  Jacque C. Young,et al.  Metaproteomics of a gutless marine worm and its symbiotic microbial community reveal unusual pathways for carbon and energy use , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Hettich,et al.  Microbial metaproteomics: identifying the repertoire of proteins that microorganisms use to compete and cooperate in complex environmental communities. , 2012, Current opinion in microbiology.

[24]  Jian Wang,et al.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler , 2012, GigaScience.

[25]  M. Strous,et al.  The Binning of Metagenomic Contigs for Microbial Physiology of Mixed Cultures , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[26]  A. Klindworth,et al.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  R. Milo What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  L. Hooper,et al.  Evaluation of methods to purify virus-like particles for metagenomic sequencing of intestinal viromes , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[29]  Oliver Serang,et al.  The Probabilistic Convolution Tree: Efficient Exact Bayesian Inference for Faster LC-MS/MS Protein Inference , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  Connor T. Skennerton,et al.  CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes , 2015, Genome research.

[31]  S. Tringe,et al.  High-Throughput Metagenomic Technologies for Complex Microbial Community Analysis: Open and Closed Formats , 2015, mBio.

[32]  R. Heyer,et al.  The MetaProteomeAnalyzer: a powerful open-source software suite for metaproteomics data analysis and interpretation. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[33]  S. Tringe,et al.  Primer and platform effects on 16S rRNA tag sequencing , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[34]  Chao Xie,et al.  Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND , 2014, Nature Methods.

[35]  Hing-Fung Ting,et al.  MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. , 2016, Methods.

[36]  N. Fierer,et al.  Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity , 2016, Nature Microbiology.

[37]  R. Heyer,et al.  Proteotyping of biogas plant microbiomes separates biogas plants according to process temperature and reactor type , 2016, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[38]  N. Jehmlich,et al.  Protein-SIP in environmental studies. , 2016, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[39]  Harald R. Gruber-Vodicka,et al.  Environmental Breviatea harbor mutualistic Arcobacter epibionts , 2016, Nature.

[40]  J. Fuhrman,et al.  Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. , 2016, Environmental microbiology.

[41]  Davide Heller,et al.  eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  José A. Dianes,et al.  2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Jüergen Cox,et al.  The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[44]  Philipp E. Geyer,et al.  Ultra-deep and quantitative saliva proteome reveals dynamics of the oral microbiome , 2016, Genome Medicine.

[45]  Thomas D Young,et al.  Tools for the Microbiome: Nano and Beyond. , 2015, ACS nano.

[46]  P. Weber,et al.  Tracking microbial interactions with NanoSIMS. , 2016, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[47]  Harald R. Gruber-Vodicka,et al.  Chemosynthetic symbionts of marine invertebrate animals are capable of nitrogen fixation , 2016, Nature Microbiology.

[48]  Alexey A. Gurevich,et al.  MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies , 2016, Bioinform..

[49]  W. Waegeman,et al.  Absolute quantification of microbial taxon abundances , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[50]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Critical decisions in metaproteomics: achieving high confidence protein annotations in a sea of unknowns , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[51]  Dan Liu,et al.  Fast and Simple Analysis of MiSeq Amplicon Sequencing Data with MetaAmp , 2017, bioRxiv.

[52]  J. Lennon,et al.  How, when, and where relic DNA biases estimates of microbial diversity , 2017, bioRxiv.

[53]  M. Strous,et al.  Robust, high-productivity phototrophic carbon capture at high pH and alkalinity using natural microbial communities , 2017, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[54]  P. Pevzner,et al.  metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. , 2017, Genome research.

[55]  J. Lennon,et al.  Relic DNA contributes minimally to estimates of microbial diversity , 2017 .