Drought resistance - is it really a complex trait?

Drought resistance is being increasingly labelled as being a 'complex trait', especially with the recent expansion of research into its genomics. There is a danger that this label may turn into an axiom that is liable to damage education on the subject as well as research and the delivery of solutions to the farmer. This opinionated review examines whether there is grounds for such an axiom. Drought resistance is labelled as a 'complex trait' mainly when viewed by molecular biologists from the gene discovery platform. This platform is capable of expressing hundreds and thousands of drought-responsive genes, which are up- or down-regulated under dehydration stress according to growth stage, plant organ or even time of day. Sorting out the 'grain out of the chaff' in order to identify the function of the candidate genes towards drought resistance is difficult and, thus, the idea that drought resistance is complex is raised. However, when drought resistance is viewed from the physiological and agronomic whole-plant and crop platform, it appears much simpler; its control, whether constitutive or adaptive, is rather obvious with respect to manipulation in breeding and crop management. The most important and common drought resistance traits function to maintain plant hydration under drought stress due to effective use of water (EUW). The state of our knowledge and the achievements in breeding for drought resistance do not support labelling drought resistance as a complex trait. The genomics road towards drought resistance is complex but we already know that the destination is much simpler.

[1]  K. Sayre,et al.  Osmotic adjustment in wheat in relation to grain yield under water deficit environments , 2005 .

[2]  C. W. Wendt,et al.  Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm , 1983 .

[3]  Abraham Blum,et al.  Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments , 2010 .

[4]  K. Shinozaki,et al.  Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[5]  R. Richards,et al.  Recent Advances in Breeding Wheat for Drought and Salt Stresses , 2007 .

[6]  J. Passioura,et al.  Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce--from breeding to field management , 2006 .

[7]  H. Thomas,et al.  Crops that stay green , 1993 .

[8]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[9]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Mapping QTLs with epistatic effects and QTL x environment interactions for plant height using a doubled haploid population in cultivated wheat. , 2008, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[10]  Jonathan H. Crouch,et al.  Marker-Assisted Selection in Plant Breeding: From Publications to Practice , 2008 .

[11]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  R. Furbank,et al.  C4 rice: a challenge for plant phenomics. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[13]  Olivia W. Wilkins,et al.  Time of day shapes Arabidopsis drought transcriptomes. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  Cai-guo Xu,et al.  Identification of quantitative trait loci and epistatic interactions for plant height and heading date in rice , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[15]  R. Furbank,et al.  Plant phenomics: from gene to form and function , 2009 .

[16]  J. Morgan.  A gene controlling differences in osmoregulation in wheat , 1991 .

[17]  Zhikang Li,et al.  Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[18]  E. Blumwald,et al.  Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. , 2011, Current opinion in plant biology.

[19]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[20]  Y. Vaadia.  Plant Hormones and Water Stress , 1976 .

[21]  Rajeev K Varshney,et al.  Agricultural biotechnology for crop improvement in a variable climate: hope or hype? , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[22]  Kris Freeman,et al.  Global genome expression analysis of rice in response to drought and high-salinity stresses in shoot, flag leaf, and panicle , 2007, Plant Molecular Biology.

[23]  W. Davies,et al.  Long-distance ABA Signaling and Its Relation to Other Signaling Pathways in the Detection of Soil Drying and the Mediation of the Plant’s Response to Drought , 2005, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[24]  M. Cooper,et al.  Improving Drought Tolerance in Maize , 2010 .

[25]  Abraham Blum,et al.  Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress , 2009 .

[26]  F. Tardieu,et al.  ’ s Choice Series on the Next Generation of Biotech Crops Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress : Where Do We Stand ? , 2008 .

[27]  W. H. Zurek.  Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information , 1990 .