Multifactorial uncertainty assessment for monitoring population abundance using computer vision

Computer vision enables in-situ monitoring of animal populations at a lower cost and with less ecosystem disturbance than with human observers. However, computer vision uncertainty may not be fully understood by end-users, and the uncertainty assessments performed by technology experts may not fully address end-user needs. This knowledge gap can yield misinterpretations of computer vision data, and trust issues impeding the transfer of valuable technologies. We bridge this gap with a user-centered analysis of the uncertainty issues. Key uncertainty factors, and their interactions, are identified from the perspective of a core task in ecology research and beyond: counting individuals from different classes. We highlight factors for which uncertainty assessment methods are currently unavailable. The remaining uncertainty assessment methods are not interoperable. Hence it is currently difficult to assess the combined results of multiple uncertainty factors, and their impact on end-user counting tasks. We propose a framework for assessing the multifactorial uncertainty propagation along the data processing pipeline. It integrates methods from both computer vision and ecology domains, and aims at supporting the statistical analysis of abundance trends for population monitoring. Our typology of uncertainty factors and our assessment methods were drawn from interviews with marine ecology and computer vision experts, and from prior work for a fish monitoring application. Our findings contribute to enabling scientific research based on computer vision.

[1]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[2]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques , 2005 .

[3]  Jacco van Ossenbruggen,et al.  Do you need experts in the crowd?: a case study in image annotation for marine biology , 2013, OAIR.

[4]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  A framework for uncertainty-aware visual analytics , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[5]  M. O'Neill,et al.  Automated species identification: why not? , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities , 2009, 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[7]  . KEE Evaluation of Fish Behaviour and Aggregation by Underwater Videography in an Artificial Reef in Tioman Island , Malaysia , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Automated processing and identification of benthic invertebrate samples , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  Michele Crosetto,et al.  Uncertainty propagation in models driven by remotely sensed data , 2001 .

[10]  Eyke Hüllermeier,et al.  On the Problem of Error Propagation in Classifier Chains for Multi-label Classification , 2012, GfKl.

[11]  Simone Palazzo,et al.  Long-term underwater camera surveillance for monitoring and analysis of fish populations , 2012 .

[12]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Approaches to uncertainty visualization , 1996, The Visual Computer.

[13]  R. Babcock,et al.  A baited underwater video system for the determination of relative density of carnivorous reef fish , 2000 .

[14]  Concetto Spampinato,et al.  Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Multimedia analysis for ecological data , 2012, MM 2012.

[15]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[16]  Emma Beauxis-Aussalet,et al.  A case study of trust issues in scientific video collections , 2013, MAED '13.

[17]  Xingquan Zhu,et al.  Class Noise vs. Attribute Noise: A Quantitative Study , 2003, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[18]  M. Edwards,et al.  The potential for computer-aided identification in biodiversity research. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  H. Visser,et al.  Estimation and detection of flexible trends , 2004 .

[20]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  On the Surprising Behavior of Distance Metrics in High Dimensional Spaces , 2001, ICDT.

[21]  Simone Palazzo,et al.  Covariance based Fish Tracking in Real-life Underwater Environment , 2018, VISAPP.

[22]  Concetto Spampinato,et al.  Multimedia analysis for ecological data , 2012, ACM Multimedia.

[23]  Adriaan D. Rijnsdorp,et al.  Signals from the shallows: in search of common patterns in long-term trends in Dutch estuarine and coastal fish , 2008 .

[24]  Lynda Hardman,et al.  Simplifying the Visualization of Confusion Matrix , 2014 .

[25]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Uncertainty-aware estimation of population abundance using machine learning , 2016, Multimedia Systems.

[26]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..

[27]  J. R. Irvine,et al.  Evaluation of a Method to Count and Measure Live Salmonids in the Field with a Video Camera and Computer , 1991 .

[28]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[29]  Nicholas J. Hetrick,et al.  Number 72 Feasibility of Using Video Technology to Estimate Salmon Escapement in the Ongivinuk River , a ClearWater Tributary of the Togiak River , 2004 .

[30]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Visualizing Geospatial Information Uncertainty: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2005 .

[31]  A. Winsor Sampling techniques. , 2000, Nursing times.

[32]  Emma Beauxis-Aussalet,et al.  Supporting Non-Experts' Awareness of Uncertainty: Negative Effects of Simple Visualizations in Multiple Views , 2015, ECCE.

[33]  Héctor Corrada Bravo,et al.  Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[34]  Lynda Hardman,et al.  Visualization of Confusion Matrix for Non-Expert Users (Poster) , 2014 .