A two-method investigation of early adolescents' responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school.

Given the passivity of many adolescents upon witnessing peer victimization, the goal of this study was to evaluate the features of school-based peer victimization events that promote helping. A sample of 470 early adolescents (52% girls; 71% White, 9% Black, 6% Latino, 2% Asian, 1% American Indian, 8% Multiethnic, and 3% Other) reported likelihood of helping and specific helping and non-helping behaviors with an experimental vignette method and through descriptions of recently witnessed real-life victimization events. With both methods, an adolescent's relationship with the victim predicted likelihood of helping and specific helping behaviors above and beyond the contribution of other key personal characteristics including gender, empathy, communal goal orientation, and previous victimization experiences. Examination of adolescents' real-life experiences yielded systematic patterns between their responses and their reasoning about the responses undertaken. The results illustrate the relevance of taking into account peer victimization event characteristics for promoting witness intervention in adolescence.

[1]  Gianmarco Altoè,et al.  Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior? , 2007, Aggressive behavior.

[2]  Philip Smith,et al.  Coping with bullying at school: children's recommended strategies and attitudes to school‐based interventions in England and Japan , 2006 .

[3]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[4]  Ken Rigby,et al.  Expressed Readiness of Australian Schoolchildren to Act as Bystanders in Support of Children who are Being Bullied , 2006 .

[5]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[6]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group , 1998 .

[7]  T. Wickens.  Multiway Contingency Tables Analysis for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[8]  D. Pepler,et al.  Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying , 2001 .

[9]  D. Pepler,et al.  Observations of Bullying and Victimization in the School Yard , 1998 .

[10]  Stephen Joseph,et al.  Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among schoolgirls , 1994 .

[11]  H. Cowie,et al.  The effectiveness of peer support systems in challenging school bullying: the perspectives and experiences of teachers and pupils. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[12]  K. Frey,et al.  Observed reductions in school bullying, nonbullying aggression, and destructive bystander behavior: A longitudinal evaluation. , 2009 .

[13]  Richard J. Hazler,et al.  Contributions of Personal and Situational Factors to Bystanders' Reactions to School Bullying , 2009 .

[14]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Rethinking the Bystander Role in School Violence Prevention , 2006, Health promotion practice.

[15]  Adrienne Nishina,et al.  Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: what does latent class analysis say? , 2007, Child development.

[16]  Sandra E. Graham.  What Educators Need to Know about Bullying Behaviors , 2010 .

[17]  Enrique Chaux.  Role of third parties in conflicts among Colombian children and early adolescents , 2005 .

[18]  Joseph E. Zins,et al.  Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Bullying in Middle School Youth: A Developmental Examination Across the Bully/Victim Continuum , 2014 .

[19]  M. J. Rogers,et al.  Children's reasoning about responses to peer aggression: Victim's and witness's expected and prescribed behaviors , 1996 .

[20]  J. Tisak,et al.  AIRA: Measurement of adolescents’ judgments regarding intentions to respond to physical and verbal aggression , 2002 .

[21]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  From Peer Putdowns to Peer Support: A Th eoretical Model and How It Translated into a National Anti-Bullying Program , 2009 .

[22]  K Rigby,et al.  Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. , 1991, The Journal of social psychology.

[23]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[24]  G. Altoé,et al.  Determinants of adolescents' active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. , 2008, Journal of adolescence.

[25]  Shelley Hymel,et al.  Bystander Responses to School Bullying: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Grade and Sex Differences , 2010 .

[26]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  An interpersonal circumplex model of children's social goals: links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[27]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[28]  M. Boulton,et al.  Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children , 2005 .

[29]  Robert Thornberg.  A classmate in distress: schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act , 2007 .

[30]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Content by , 2005 .

[32]  Adrienne Nishina,et al.  When Might Peer Aggression, Victimization, and Conflict Have Its Largest Impact? Microcontextual Considerations , 2010 .

[33]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations , 2004 .

[34]  E. Ahmed.  Understanding bullying from a shame management perspective: Findings from a three-year follow-up study , 2006, Educational and Child Psychology.