Research ethics for mobile sensing device use by vulnerable populations.

Devices equipped with sensors to track mobility, such as through Global Position Systems (GPS) and accelerometery, are increasingly being used for research. Following Canadian, US, and International guidelines there is a need to give special consideration when conducting research with vulnerable populations. This paper examines specific ethical concerns for conducting research with mobile sensing devices for use by vulnerable populations, considering aspects of both research design and research process. Drawing on insights from feminist design and aligned fields, such as participatory design and action research, we contend that any research design and process for working with vulnerable populations must be developed in collaboration with the particular groups and communities who are part of the research. As part of this process of collaborative research, we discuss risks in terms of the lack of control over data associated with choosing commercial devices, as well as practicality and obtrusiveness of devices for the wearer. We also discuss the significance of informed consent and refusal and issues relating to security and safety during research. As part of the collaborative research design and process, we argue that participants should be given as much control over their data as possible. Based on this discussion, we provide recommendations for researchers to consider, which are broadly relevant for research using mobile sensing devices but particularly significant in relation to vulnerable populations.

[1]  J. Meyer,et al.  Qualitative research in health care: Using qualitative methods in health related action research , 2000 .

[2]  Morgan Klaus Scheuerman,et al.  Safe Spaces and Safe Places , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Kristen Day,et al.  Application of global positioning system methods for the study of obesity and hypertension risk among low-income housing residents in New York City: a spatial feasibility study. , 2014, Geospatial health.

[4]  Os Keyes,et al.  The Misgendering Machines , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  A. Mirzazadeh,et al.  Acceptability of Global Positioning System technology to survey injecting drug users' movements and social interactions: a pilot study from San Francisco, USA. , 2014, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[6]  Xingshe Zhou,et al.  Detecting wandering behavior based on GPS traces for elders with dementia , 2012, 2012 12th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV).

[7]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[9]  C. Tseng,et al.  Epidemiology, Sexual Risk Behavior, and HIV Prevention Practices of Men who Have Sex with Men Using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California , 2013, Journal of Urban Health.

[10]  Scott Duncan,et al.  Using global positioning systems in health research: a practical approach to data collection and processing. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Jessica K. Athens,et al.  Residential and GPS-Defined Activity Space Neighborhood Noise Complaints, Body Mass Index and Blood Pressure Among Low-Income Housing Residents in New York City , 2017, Journal of Community Health.

[12]  R. Gonzales.  Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness , 2016 .

[13]  Hannah Lebovits.  Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018, Public Integrity.

[14]  Jeffrey Knockel,et al.  Every step you fake: a comparative analysis of fitness tracker privacy and security , 2016 .

[15]  A. Davis.  Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment , 1993 .

[16]  D. Fitch,et al.  Review of "Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism," by Noble, S. U. (2018). New York, New York: NYU Press. , 2018, CDQR.

[17]  Tjeerd W. Boonstra,et al.  Using smartphone sensor technology for mental health research: Clear obstacles and hidden challenges , 2018, ArXiv.

[18]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  International Journal of Health Geographics Open Access Using Gps-enabled Cell Phones to Track the Travel Patterns of Adolescents , 2022 .

[19]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Trajectory anonymity in publishing personal mobility data , 2011, SKDD.

[20]  Sheila E. Widnall,et al.  Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine , 2018 .

[21]  K. Crenshaw.  Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color , 1991 .

[22]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Disagreeable Privacy Policies: Mismatches between Meaning and Users’ Understanding , 2014 .

[23]  John S Brownstein,et al.  No place to hide--reverse identification of patients from published maps. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  N H Lovell,et al.  Unintended Consequences of Wearable Sensor Use in Healthcare , 2016, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[25]  K. Crist,et al.  A Multi-Case Study Of Research Using Mobile Imaging, Sensing And Tracking Technologies To Objectively Measure Behavior: Ethical Issues And Insights To Guide Responsible Research Practice , 2015 .

[26]  K. Crenshaw.  Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics , 1989 .

[27]  Danielle M. Lottridge,et al.  "Genderfluid" or "Attack Helicopter": Responsible HCI Research Practice with Non-binary Gender Variation in Online Communities , 2018, CHI.

[28]  Elizabeth Tunstall.  Decolonizing Design Innovation: Design Anthropology, Critical Anthropology, and Indigenous Knowledge , 2020 .

[29]  D. Duncan,et al.  Characterizing Geosocial-Networking App Use Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Multi-City Cross-Sectional Survey in the Southern United States , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[30]  Bimlesh Wadhwa,et al.  Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives within the HCI Community , 2014, IHCI.

[31]  Maja van der Velden,et al.  Participatory Design and Design for Values , 2015 .

[32]  C. Proulx.  Colonizing Surveillance: Canada Constructs an Indigenous Terror Threat , 2014 .

[33]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Michael R. Kramer,et al.  Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[35]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[36]  Simone Browne,et al.  Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness , 2015 .

[37]  Y. Khaliq,et al.  Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans , 2012 .

[38]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  A Framework for Using GPS Data in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Studies , 2015, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[39]  Sasha Costanza-Chock.  Design Justice, A.I., and Escape from the Matrix of Domination , 2018, Journal of Design and Science.

[40]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class , 2017, CHI.

[41]  M. Boulos,et al.  Musings on privacy issues in health research involving disaggregate geographic data about individuals , 2009, International journal of health geographics.

[42]  Michael R. Kramer,et al.  Use of a Google Map Tool Embedded in an Internet Survey Instrument: Is it a Valid and Reliable Alternative to Geocoded Address Data? , 2014, JMIR research protocols.

[43]  Vitaly Shmatikov,et al.  Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008).

[44]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[45]  D. Massey.  American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  D. Massey.  American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1993 .

[47]  S. Friedman,et al.  Feasibility and Acceptability of Global Positioning System (GPS) Methods to Study the Spatial Contexts of Substance Use and Sexual Risk Behaviors among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in New York City: A P18 Cohort Sub-Study , 2016, PloS one.

[48]  Sébastien Gambs,et al.  Show me how you move and I will tell you who you are , 2010, SPRINGL '10.

[49]  Jessica K. Athens,et al.  Assessments of residential and global positioning system activity space for food environments, body mass index and blood pressure among low-income housing residents in New York City. , 2018, Geospatial health.

[50]  Kevin G. Stanley,et al.  Ethical implications of location and accelerometer measurement in health research studies with mobile sensing devices. , 2017, Social science & medicine.

[51]  J. Kerr,et al.  Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[52]  Marika Cifor,et al.  Inscribing Gender: A Duoethnographic Examination of Gendered Values and Practices in Fitness Tracker Design , 2019, HICSS.

[53]  Audra Simpson.  On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice’ and Colonial Citizenship , 2007 .

[54]  J. Brady,et al.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. , 2014, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[55]  Ruha Benjamin,et al.  Informed Refusal , 2016 .

[56]  Sasha Costanza-Chock.  Design Justice: Towards an Intersectional Feminist Framework for Design Theory and Practice , 2018, DRS2018: Catalyst.

[57]  Timnit Gebru,et al.  Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification , 2018, FAT.

[58]  J. Wajcman.  FROM WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY TO GENDERED TECHNOSCIENCE , 2007 .

[59]  P. Halkitis,et al.  Collecting Mobility Data with GPS Methods to Understand the HIV Environmental Riskscape Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Multi-city Feasibility Study in the Deep South , 2018, AIDS and behavior.

[60]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design , 2015 .

[61]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Privacy and spatial pattern preservation in masked GPS trajectory data , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[62]  M. Rand,et al.  National Crime Victimization Survey: Stalking Victimization in the United States , 2009 .

[63]  S. Reisner,et al.  Acceptability and Feasibility of Using a Novel Geospatial Method to Measure Neighborhood Contexts and Mobility Among Transgender Women in New York City , 2017, Transgender health.

[64]  Nadir Weibel,et al.  Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives , 2017, AJOB empirical bioethics.

[65]  K. Tallbear,et al.  Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science , 2013 .

[66]  Stanley S. Sokul.  Office of the United States Trade Representative , 2003 .

[67]  Louise Potvin,et al.  Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[68]  John Torous,et al.  Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.