A novel Fuzzy Bayesian Network approach for safety analysis of process systems; An application of HFACS and SHIPP methodology

Abstract Chemical process industries (CPI) are inherently hazardous complex systems where large inventory of extremely flammable and explosive chemicals are processed and stored in a highly congested process area. A reliable safety analysis method plays a significant role to measure risks and to develop preventive strategies in process industries. This paper proposed a novel Fuzzy Bayesian Network for dynamic safety analysis of process systems by incorporating Bayesian network (BN) with Fuzzy Best Worst Method (Fuzzy-BWM). In the proposed approach a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of human and organizational factors (HOFs) involving in the accident scenario occurrence was also provided by integrating Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and System Hazard Identification, Prediction and Prevention (SHIPP) methodology into the model. An ethylene storage tank was selected to verify the applicability of the proposed approach and its application potential. The study also explained a comparison between the results of the proposed Fuzzy-BWM approach with the conventional BN approach and a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) conventional technique such as bow-tie (BT). The findings revealed the capability of the proposed Fuzzy-BWM approach to provide high reliable results and to detect risks that using the BT and BN approaches were not identified.

[1]  Sen Guo,et al.  Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Safety analysis of process systems using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN) , 2019, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[3]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. , 2017, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Faisal Khan,et al.  SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description , 2011 .

[5]  Prashant Srivastava,et al.  Risk and reliability assessment in chemical process industries using Bayesian methods , 2014 .

[6]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  An Offshore Risk Analysis Method Using Fuzzy Bayesian Network , 2009 .

[7]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  A fuzzy Bayesian belief network for safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines , 2016 .

[8]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Accident modelling and analysis in process industries , 2014 .

[9]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Towards dynamic risk analysis: A review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry , 2016 .

[10]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[11]  Mehdi Jahangiri,et al.  A Novel Fuzzy Bayesian Network-HFACS (FBN-HFACS) model for analyzing Human and Organization Factors (HOFs) in process accidents , 2019 .

[12]  Kang Liu,et al.  Risk Analysis on Leakage Failure of Natural Gas Pipelines by Fuzzy Bayesian Network with a Bow-Tie Model , 2017, Sci. Program..

[13]  Kamarizan Kidam,et al.  Method for identifying contributors to chemical process accidents , 2013 .

[14]  Prashant Srivastava,et al.  Dynamic failure assessment of an ammonia storage unit: A case study , 2015 .

[15]  Min Xie,et al.  Investigations of Human and Organizational Factors in hazardous vapor accidents. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  V. R. Renjith,et al.  Two-dimensional fuzzy fault tree analysis for chlorine release from a chlor-alkali industry using expert elicitation. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[18]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[19]  Xianguo Wu,et al.  Towards a Fuzzy Bayesian Network Based Approach for Safety Risk Analysis of Tunnel‐Induced Pipeline Damage , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  T. Onisawa An approach to human reliability on man-machine systems using error possibility , 1988 .

[21]  Zhiqiang Hou,et al.  Based on Fuzzy Bayesian Network of Oil Wharf Handling Risk Assessment , 2016 .

[22]  Sohag Kabir,et al.  Fuzzy evidence theory and Bayesian networks for process systems risk analysis , 2018, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal.

[23]  Yiik Diew Wong,et al.  A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis – The case of tanker shipping , 2018 .

[24]  Z Y Han,et al.  Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[25]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network , 2013 .

[26]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Dynamic safety risk modeling of process systems using bayesian network , 2017 .

[27]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Bayesian-network-based safety risk analysis in construction projects , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Hongwei Zhu,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network , 2016 .

[30]  Andreas Lumbe Aas The Human Factors Assessment and Classification System (HFACS) for the Oil & Gas Industry , 2008 .