Control Analysis and Design for Statistical Models of Spiking Networks

A popular approach to characterizing activity in neuronal networks is the use of statistical models that describe neurons in terms of their firing rates (i.e., the number of spikes produced per unit time). The output realization of a statistical model is, in essence, an $n-$ dimensional binary time series, or pattern. While such models are commonly fit to data, they can also be postulated de novo, as a theoretical description of a given spiking network. More generally, they can model any network producing binary events as a function of time. In this paper, we rigorously develop a set of analyses that may be used to assay the controllability of a particular statistical spiking model, the point-process generalized linear model. Our analysis quantifies the ease or difficulty of inducing desired spiking patterns via an extrinsic input signal, thus providing a framework for basic network analysis, as well as for emerging applications such as neurostimulation design.

[1]  André Longtin,et al.  Stochastic optimal control of single neuron spike trains. , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  FitzHugh-Nagumo model , 2006, Scholarpedia.

[3]  Jr-Shin Li,et al.  Optimal design of minimum-power stimuli for phase models of neuron oscillators. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Spike timing : mechanisms and function , 2013 .

[5]  Valerie Isham,et al.  Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity , 2002 .

[7]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Designing optimal stimuli to control neuronal spike timing. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Victor Solo,et al.  Likelihood functions for multivariate point processes with coincidences. , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Sean N. Brennan,et al.  Observability and Controllability of Nonlinear Networks: The Role of Symmetry , 2013, Physical review. X.

[10]  Ali Nabi,et al.  Minimum energy desynchronizing control for coupled neurons , 2012, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[11]  B. Melamed,et al.  Traffic modeling for telecommunications networks , 1994, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  T. Kanamaru,et al.  Theoretical analysis of array-enhanced stochastic resonance in the diffusively coupled FitzHugh-Nagumo equation. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[15]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[16]  Uri T Eden,et al.  A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Y. Ogata Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 1998 .

[18]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[19]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[20]  Jason T. Ritt,et al.  Non-negative inputs for underactuated control of spiking in coupled integrate-and-fire neurons , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[21]  Nancy Kopell,et al.  Synchronization in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons with Sparse, Random Connectivity , 2003, Neural Computation.

[22]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Random Point Processes in Time and Space , 1991 .

[23]  Jason T. Ritt,et al.  Control strategies for underactuated neural ensembles driven by optogenetic stimulation , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[24]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Algorithms for the analysis of ensemble neural spiking activity using simultaneous-event multivariate point-process models , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[25]  M. Wilson,et al.  Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity , 2005, Neural Computation.

[26]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[27]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  The Time-Rescaling Theorem and Its Application to Neural Spike Train Data Analysis , 2002, Neural Computation.