Assessment of Omecamtiv Mecarbil for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Heart Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data From the GALACTIC-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a progressive clinical syndrome, and many patients' condition worsen over time despite treatment. Patients with more severe disease are often intolerant of available medical therapies. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil for the treatment of patients with severe heart failure (HF) enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants The GALACTIC-HF study was a global double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial that was conducted at multiple centers between January 2017 and August 2020. A total of 8232 patients with symptomatic HF (defined as New York Heart Association symptom class II-IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less were randomized to receive omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo and followed up for a median of 21.8 months (range, 15.4-28.6 months). The current post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil therapy among patients classified as having severe HF compared with patients without severe HF. Severe HF was defined as the presence of all of the following criteria: New York Heart Association symptom class III to IV, left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less, and hospitalization for HF within the previous 6 months. Interventions Participants were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was time to first HF event or cardiovascular (CV) death. Secondary end points included time to CV death and safety and tolerability. Results Among 8232 patients enrolled in the GALACTIC-HF clinical trial, 2258 patients (27.4%; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.6] years; 1781 men [78.9%]) met the specified criteria for severe HF. Of those, 1106 patients were randomized to the omecamtiv mecarbil group and 1152 to the placebo group. Patients with severe HF who received omecamtiv mecarbil experienced a significant treatment benefit for the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90), whereas patients without severe HF had no significant treatment benefit (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.08; P = .005 for interaction). For CV death, the results were similar (HR for patients with vs without severe HF: 0.88 [95% CI, 0.75-1.03] vs 1.10 [95% CI, 0.97-1.25]; P = .03 for interaction). Omecamtiv mecarbil therapy was well tolerated in patients with severe HF, with no significant changes in blood pressure, kidney function, or potassium level compared with placebo. Conclusions and Relevance In this post hoc analysis of data from the GALACTIC-HF clinical trial, omecamtiv mecarbil therapy may have provided a clinically meaningful reduction in the composite end point of time to first HF event or CV death among patients with severe HF. These data support a potential role of omecamtiv mecarbil therapy among patients for whom current treatment options are limited. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02929329.

[1]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure. , 2021, Journal of cardiac failure.

[2]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Cardiac Myosin Activation with Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Systolic Heart Failure. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: GALACTIC‐HF baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials , 2020, European journal of heart failure.

[4]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Sacubitril/Valsartan in Advanced Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction , 2020, JACC: Heart Failure.

[5]  S. Solomon,et al.  Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of GALACTIC-HF. , 2020, JACC. Heart failure.

[6]  Davor Milicic,et al.  Advanced heart failure: a position statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology , 2018, European journal of heart failure.

[7]  L. Allen,et al.  Ambulatory Inotrope Infusions in Advanced Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, JACC. Heart failure.

[8]  Piotr Ponikowski,et al.  Chronic Oral Study of Myosin Activation to Increase Contractility in Heart Failure (COSMIC-HF): a phase 2, pharmacokinetic, randomised, placebo-controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[9]  L. Stevenson,et al.  INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) Profiling Identifies Ambulatory Patients at High Risk on Medical Therapy After Hospitalizations for Heart Failure , 2016, Circulation. Heart failure.

[10]  M. Walsh,et al.  Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee. , 2015, Journal of cardiac failure.

[11]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Hospital Variation in Intravenous Inotrope Use for Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: Insights From Get With The Guidelines , 2014, Circulation. Heart failure.

[12]  Biykem Bozkurt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[13]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2012, Circulation.

[14]  J. Goldman,et al.  Dose-dependent augmentation of cardiac systolic function with the selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil: a first-in-man study , 2011, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Cleland,et al.  The effects of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, on cardiac function in systolic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging phase 2 trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[16]  K. Schulman,et al.  Resource use in the last 6 months of life among medicare beneficiaries with heart failure, 2000-2007. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  D. DeMets,et al.  Effects of low-dose oral enoximone administration on mortality, morbidity, and exercise capacity in patients with advanced heart failure: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group ESSENTIAL trials , 2009, European heart journal.

[18]  Michael Böhm,et al.  Advanced chronic heart failure: A position statement from the Study Group on Advanced Heart Failure of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology , 2007, European journal of heart failure.

[19]  J. Kors,et al.  Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Heart Failure Stages: Application of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Heart Failure Staging Criteria in the Community , 2007, Circulation.

[20]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Risk-treatment mismatch in the pharmacotherapy of heart failure. , 2005, JAMA.

[21]  B. Pitt,et al.  The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Cohn,et al.  The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.