Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers

We analyze the state of the art of indicators on e-government, e-health, e-procurement and e-participation. We survey the main methodological properties of these indicators, and highlight their heuristic potential. Further, we address empirically the issue of the explanation of the availability scores, i.e. how the supply of the various e-services in each country is affected by political, institutional and socio-economic differences, and is followed by actual usage. The econometric analysis uncovers the importance of broadband penetration and higher education as drivers for most of the types of e-services and users (citizens and businesses). Moreover, a corruption-free and agile public sector proves to be an important pre-condition for more effective supply and usage. Despite data limitations and the complexity of the underlying diffusion phenomena, our study is the first truly longitudinal contribution aimed at disentangling the common drivers of such an important phenomenon – the e-services availability and usage across European countries. As such, this work appears useful to inform the policy debate and practice, in a phase characterized by a prospective reorientation of the public e-services provision and policy agenda.

[1]  Chon-Kyun Kim,et al.  A Cross-national Analysis of Global E-government , 2007 .

[2]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues , 2010 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[4]  James Melitski,et al.  Digital Government Worldwide: A e-Government Assessment of Municipal Web Sites , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[5]  S. Taipale.  The use of e-government services and the Internet: The role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors , 2013 .

[6]  Samer Faraj,et al.  What Shapes Global Diffusion of e-Government: Comparing the Influence of National Governance Institutions , 2010, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[7]  David Wilson,et al.  Balancing revisability and robustness? A new institutionalist perspective on local government modernization , 2003 .

[8]  Mateja Kunstelj,et al.  Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[9]  Davy Janssen,et al.  If you measure it they will score: An assessment of international eGovernment benchmarking , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[10]  George S. Ford.  Broadband expectations and the convergence of ranks , 2011 .

[11]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011) , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[13]  Kaiju Chang,et al.  Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective , 2011 .

[14]  Susan P. Williams,et al.  Assembling E‐Government Research Designs: A Transdisciplinary View and Interactive Approach , 2011 .

[15]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  e-Government stakeholders - Who are they and what do they want? , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[18]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[20]  Haiyan Qian.  Global perspectives on e-governance: from government-driven to citizen-centric public service delivery , 2010, ICEGOV '10.

[21]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Yuan Long,et al.  Factors Impacting E-Government Development , 2009, ICIS.

[23]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[24]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons , 2007 .

[25]  Xavier Fernández-i-Marín,et al.  The Impact of e-Government Promotion in Europe: Internet Dependence and Critical Mass , 2011 .

[26]  Andrew Whitmore,et al.  A statistical analysis of the construction of the United Nations E-Government Development Index , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  What Drives Global E-Governance? An Exploratory Study at a Macro Level , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Kris Snijkers,et al.  Digital administration and the role of trust , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[30]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Moderating effects of governance on information infrastructure and e-government development , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  E. Gualmini.  RESTRUCTURING WEBERIAN BUREAUCRACY: COMPARING MANAGERIAL REFORMS IN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES , 2008 .

[32]  R. J. Cline,et al.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. , 2001, Health education research.

[33]  Federico Belotti,et al.  Technology Adoption and Innovation in Public Services: The Case of E-Government in Italy , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[34]  Fabrizio Panozzo.  Management by decree. Paradoxes in the reform of the Italian public sector , 2000 .

[35]  Davide Arduini,et al.  The role of technology, organization and contextual factors in the development of e-Government services: An empirical analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations☆ , 2013 .

[36]  T. Lawson.  Economics and Reality , 1997 .

[37]  David Osimo.  Benchmarking eGovernment in the Web 2.0 era: what to measure, and how , 2008 .

[38]  N. Matteucci.  Interoperability provision in NGC: the case of Italian DTV , 2009 .

[39]  C. Weare,et al.  Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government , 2011 .

[40]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  eParticipation research: Systematizing the field , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  Barbara Ubaldi,et al.  Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.

[42]  Paolo Seri,et al.  The co-evolution of ICT, skills and organization in public administrations: Evidence from new European country-level data , 2013 .

[43]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The 2014 State New Economy Index , 2010 .

[44]  Fadi Salem,et al.  Benchmarking the E-Government Bulldozer: Beyond Measuring the Tread Marks , 2007 .