Cognitive and linguistic features of adolescent argumentative writing: Do connectives signal more complex reasoning?

The Common Core State Standards (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2010) feature argumentative writing across the curriculum in grades 4 through 12, yet little is known about how young adolescents develop the challenging advanced language and literacy skills needed for these tasks. This study explored productive academic language use in the persuasive writing of a sample of 40 middle school students (grades 6–8) by examining the use of (1) argumentative moves that display various levels of sophistication and (2) major classes of connectives (additive, adversative, causal, and temporal) that signal different cohesive functions within a text. Essays in our analytical sample (n = 158) were produced in the context of an academic vocabulary curriculum, Word Generation, and were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for types of arguments by researchers and undergraduate research assistants. Subsequently, connectives were calculated by the Tool for the Automated Analysis of Cohesion (TAACO; Crossley, Kyle, & McNamara, 2016). Descriptive analyses reveal that the sixth–eighth grade students in our sample deployed complex reasoning in their essays; at least one dual perspective argument was present in 50% of the essays, and at least one integrative perspective argument was present in 42% of the essays. Multivariate regression analyses (with adjusted standard errors) reveal that adversative connectives (e.g., although, however) were related to the most complex arguments (integrative perspective), controlling for essay length and topic type (β = 20.13, p = .006), as well as to overall argument sophistication (β = 17.25, p = .02). The results show the value of brief, curriculum-based essays for assessing students’ argumentation skills.

[1]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[2]  Chunyu Hu,et al.  Discourse Connectives in L1 and L2 Argumentative Writing , 2015 .

[3]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation , 2008 .

[4]  A. D. Joaquin,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy , 2009 .

[5]  Mary J. Schleppegrell The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective , 2004 .

[6]  Joshua Lawrence,et al.  Narrative Writing in Digital Formats: Interpreting the Impact of Audience , 2015 .

[7]  Amy C. Crosson,et al.  Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English learners and English‐only students? , 2013 .

[8]  Marion Crowhurst,et al.  Cohesion in Argument and Narration at Three Grade Levels , 1987, Research in the Teaching of English.

[9]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  The Challenge of Academic Language , 2009 .

[10]  David Rose,et al.  Writing as linguistic mastery: the development of genre- based literacy pedagogy , 2008 .

[11]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[12]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.

[13]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  A Research Agenda for Educational Linguistics , 2008 .

[14]  E. Sanchez,et al.  Core academic language skills: An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in preadolescent and adolescent learners , 2014, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[15]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[16]  Jeannette Mancilla-Martinez Word Meanings Matter: Cultivating English Vocabulary Knowledge in Fifth‐Grade Spanish‐Speaking Language Minority Learners , 2010 .

[17]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts , 2008 .

[18]  C. Torgerson,et al.  Teaching argument writing to 7‐ to 14‐year‐olds: an international review of the evidence of successful practice , 2009 .

[19]  Kellogg W. Hunt,et al.  A Synopsis of Clause-to-Sentence Length Factors , 1965 .

[20]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[21]  C. Snow,et al.  The SERP Approach to Problem-Solving Research, Development, and Implementation , 2013 .

[22]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , 2022 .

[23]  C. Snow,et al.  The Poor Get Richer: Heterogeneity in the Efficacy of a School-Level Intervention for Academic Language , 2017 .

[24]  Richard Andrews,et al.  Teaching argument writing to 7-14 year olds: an international review , 2009 .

[25]  C. Snow,et al.  Toward Disciplinary Literacy: Dilemmas and Challenges in Designing History Curriculum to Support Middle School Students. , 2015 .

[26]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study , 2014 .

[27]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument , 2007 .

[28]  W. Penuel,et al.  Design-Based Implementation Research: An Emerging Model for Transforming the Relationship of Research and Practice , 2013 .

[29]  C. Barr,et al.  Beyond Vocabulary: Exploring Cross-Disciplinary Academic-Language Proficiency and Its Association With Reading Comprehension , 2015 .

[30]  Elizabeth Birr Moje,et al.  Adolescent Literacy Development in Out-of-School Time: A Practitioner's Guide. Final Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York's Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. , 2010 .

[31]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Measuring Argumentative Reasoning: What's behind the Numbers?. , 2009 .

[32]  James R. Martin,et al.  Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective , 2009 .

[33]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  The development of argument skills. , 2003, Child development.

[34]  Connectives: Fitting Another Piece of the Vocabulary Instruction Puzzle. , 2013 .

[35]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking , 2011, Psychological science.

[36]  Joshua Fahey Lawrence,et al.  Learning to Write in Middle School , 2013 .

[37]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument , 2001 .