Title A multicenter evaluation of oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel noninvasive oral pressure therapy (OPT) (Winx , ApniCure) system on polysomnographic measures of sleep-disordered breathing, sleep architecture, and sleep stability in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Subjects and methods: A 4-week, multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, first-night order of control vs treatment, single-arm trial was conducted in five American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) – accredited sleep clinics and one research laboratory. Sixty-three subjects (analysis cohort) were studied from a screening cohort of 367 subjects. The analysis cohort was 69.8% men, ages 53.6 ± 8.9 years (mean ± SD), body mass index of 32.3 ± 4.5 kg/m, with mild to severe OSA. At treatment initiation, subjects received random assignment to one night with and one without (control) treatment, and they were assessed again following 28 nights of treatment. Breathing and sleep architecture were assessed each night based on blind scoring by a single centralized scorer using AASM criteria. Results: Average nightly usage across the take-home period was 6.0 ± 1.4 h. There were no severe or serious device-related adverse events (AEs). Median apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) was 27.5 events per hour on the control night, 13.4 events per hour on the first treatment night, and 14.8 events per hour after 28 days of treatment. A clinically significant response (treatment AHI 610/h and 650% of control values) was seen in 20 of the 63 subjects evaluated. Rapid eye movement percentage (REM%) was significantly increased, and N1%, stage shifts to N1 sleep, overall stage shifts, total awakenings, and arousals per hour were all significantly reduced at both treatment nights compared to controls. Mean Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) was significantly reduced from 12.1 to 8.6 (Cohen d effect size, 0.68) in those untreated for two or more weeks prior to OPT study participation and remained unchanged in subjects who directly switched from continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy to OPT. Conclusion: Clinically significant improvements in sleep quality and continuity, AHI, ODI, ESS, and overall clinical status were achieved in an easily identified subgroup. OPT was safe and well-tolerated and nightly usage was high. 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Greg Maislin,et al.  Continuous positive airway pressure treatment of sleepy patients with milder obstructive sleep apnea: results of the CPAP Apnea Trial North American Program (CATNAP) randomized clinical trial. , 2012, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[2]  Deborah A. Nichols,et al.  Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea patients: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). , 2012, Sleep.

[3]  E. Tasali,et al.  Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Type 2 Diabetes: Is There a Link? , 2012, Front. Neur..

[4]  R. Schwab,et al.  Mechanism Of Action Of A Novel Device Using Oral Pressure Therapy (OPT) For The Treatment Of OSA , 2012, ATS 2012.

[5]  P. Gay,et al.  A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP. , 2012, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[6]  T. Penzel,et al.  Auto bi-level pressure relief–PAP is as effective as CPAP in OSA patients—a pilot study , 2012, Sleep and Breathing.

[7]  S. Javaheri,et al.  The performance of two automatic servo-ventilation devices in the treatment of central sleep apnea. , 2011, Sleep.

[8]  S. Redline,et al.  Role of obstructive sleep apnea in cardiovascular disease , 2011, Current opinion in cardiology.

[9]  T. Penzel,et al.  Positive airway pressure initiation: a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of therapy mode and titration process on efficacy, adherence, and outcomes. , 2011, Sleep.

[10]  J. Wheatley,et al.  Equivalence of nasal and oronasal masks during initial CPAP titration for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. , 2011, Sleep.

[11]  N. Marshall,et al.  A randomized crossover trial of the effect of a novel method of pressure control (SensAwake) in automatic continuous positive airway pressure therapy to treat sleep disordered breathing. , 2011, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[12]  W. McNicholas,et al.  Nasal pillows as an alternative interface in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome initiating continuous positive airway pressure therapy , 2011, Journal of sleep research.

[13]  R. Berry,et al.  A novel nasal expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Sleep.

[14]  D. Rapoport,et al.  Predictors of response to a nasal expiratory resistor device and its potential mechanisms of action for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. , 2011, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[15]  P. Schweitzer,et al.  A convenient expiratory positive airway pressure nasal device for the treatment of sleep apnea in patients non-adherent with continuous positive airway pressure. , 2011, Sleep medicine.

[16]  N. Douglas,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of variable-pressure versus fixed-pressure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). , 2010, Sleep.

[17]  N. Glozier,et al.  Obstructive sleep apnea and depression. , 2009, Sleep medicine reviews.

[18]  B. Caffo,et al.  Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[19]  W. Bardwell,et al.  CPAP and behavioral therapies in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: effects on daytime sleepiness, mood, and cognitive function. , 2009, Sleep medicine reviews.

[20]  I. Colrain,et al.  A pilot evaluation of a nasal expiratory resistance device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. , 2008, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[21]  Ronald R Grunstein,et al.  Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. , 2008, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[22]  Cathy Alessi,et al.  Practice parameters for the medical therapy of obstructive sleep apnea. , 2006, Sleep.

[23]  Max Hirshkowitz,et al.  Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. , 2006, Sleep.

[24]  R. Mcevoy,et al.  Continuous positive airway pressure reduces daytime sleepiness in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis , 2006, Thorax.

[25]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Treatment adherence and outcomes in flexible vs standard continuous positive airway pressure therapy. , 2005, Chest.

[26]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for treating sleepiness in a diverse population with obstructive sleep apnea: results of a meta-analysis. , 2003 .

[27]  T. Young,et al.  Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[28]  David Watts Apnea , 1997, The Lancet.

[29]  F. Sériès,et al.  Effects of mouth opening on upper airway collapsibility in normal sleeping subjects. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[30]  T. Young,et al.  Epidemiology and Natural History of Obstructive Sleep Apnea , 1993, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[31]  C. Guilleminault,et al.  Sleep apnea syndrome due to upper airway obstruction: a review of 25 cases. , 1977, Archives of internal medicine.