Autonomous Hypothesis Generation as an Environment Learning Mechanism for Agent Design

Studies on agent design have been focused on the internal structure of an agent that facilities decision-making subject to domain specific tasks. The domain and environment knowledge of an artificial agent is often hard coded by system engineers, which is both time-consuming and task dependent. In order to enable an agent to model its general environment with limited human involvement, in this paper, we first define a novel autonomous hypothesis generation problem. Consequently, we present two algorithms as its solutions. Experiments show that an agent using the proposed algorithm can correctly reconstruct its environment model to a certain extent.

[1]  Luc Steels,et al.  When are robots intelligent autonomous agents? , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Alfredo Milani,et al.  PLANNING IN REACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS , 2007, Comput. Intell..

[3]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation , 2000, SIGMOD 2000.

[4]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[5]  Marco Mirolli,et al.  Intrinsically Motivated Learning in Natural and Artificial Systems , 2013 .

[6]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  The causes for no causation: A computational perspective , 2011, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[7]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  AM, an artificial intelligence approach to discovery in mathematics as heuristic search , 1976 .

[8]  J. Schmidhuber What''s interesting? , 1997 .

[9]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation Systems for Autonomous Mental Development , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents , 1996, ATAL.

[11]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Active learning of inverse models with intrinsically motivated goal exploration in robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  D. Rubin Teaching Statistical Inference for Causal Effects in Experiments and Observational Studies , 2004 .

[13]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Intelligent Agents III , 1997 .

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[15]  J. Neyman,et al.  Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation , 1935 .

[16]  John S. Gero,et al.  Curious agents and situated design evaluations , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[17]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[18]  Kathryn E. Merrick,et al.  Motivated Reinforcement Learning - Curious Characters for Multiuser Games , 2009 .

[19]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Intelligent agents: theory and practice , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[20]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[21]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..