Dynamic Emotions of Supporters and Opponents of Anti-racism Movement from George Floyd Protests

Social media empowers citizens to raise the voice and expressed civil outrage leads to collective action to change the society. Since social media welcomes anyone regardless of the political ideology or perspectives, social media is where the supporters and opponents of specific issue discuss. This study attempts to empirically examine a recent antiracism movement initiated by the death of George Floyd with the lens of stance prediction and aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA). First, this study found the stance of the tweet and users do change over the course of the protest. Furthermore, there are more users who shifted the stance compared to those who maintained the stance. Second, both supporters and opponents expressed negative sentiment more on nine extracted aspects. This indicates that there was no significant difference of sentiment among supporters and opponents and raise a caution in predicting stance based on the sentiment. The contribution of the study is two-fold. First, ABSA was explored in the context of computational social science and second, stance prediction was first attempted at scale.

[1]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Experimental explorations on short text topic mining between LDA and NMF based Schemes , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  Combining motivations and emotion: The motivational dynamics of protest participation , 2011 .

[3]  Haris Papageorgiou,et al.  SemEval-2016 Task 5: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , 2016, *SEMEVAL.

[4]  Sebastian Stabinger,et al.  Adapt or Get Left Behind: Domain Adaptation through BERT Language Model Finetuning for Aspect-Target Sentiment Classification , 2020, LREC.

[5]  Lidong Bing,et al.  Exploiting BERT for End-to-End Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis , 2019, EMNLP.

[6]  Luyao Huang,et al.  Utilizing BERT for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Constructing Auxiliary Sentence , 2019, NAACL.

[7]  J. Jasper The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions In and Around Social Movements , 1998 .

[8]  Nikos Pelekis,et al.  DataStories at SemEval-2017 Task 4: Deep LSTM with Attention for Message-level and Topic-based Sentiment Analysis , 2017, *SEMEVAL.

[9]  Ersin Dincelli,et al.  Information diffusion and opinion change during the gezi park protests: Homophily or social influence? , 2016, ASIST.

[10]  Karin Wahl-Jorgensen News Media and the Emotional Public Sphere| Toward a Typology of Mediated Anger: Routine Coverage of Protest and Political Emotion , 2018 .

[11]  Alice H. Oh,et al.  Aspect and sentiment unification model for online review analysis , 2011, WSDM '11.

[12]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization , 2000, NIPS.

[13]  Saif Mohammad,et al.  SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets , 2016, *SEMEVAL.

[14]  Hee Min,et al.  Role of Social Media and Emotion in South Korea’s Presidential Impeachment Protests , 2019, Issues & Studies.

[15]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Emotion Work in High-Risk Social Movements: Managing Fear in the U.S. and East German Civil Rights Movements , 2001 .

[16]  Suresh Manandhar,et al.  SemEval-2014 Task 4: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , 2014, *SEMEVAL.

[17]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Burst Your Bubble! An Intelligent System for Improving Awareness of Diverse Social Opinions , 2018, IUI.

[18]  D. Boyd,et al.  The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions , 2011 .

[19]  Andreas van Cranenburgh Active DOP: an Active Learning Constituency Treebank Annotation Tool , 2018, COLING.

[20]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Emotion and rationality: The characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects , 2009 .

[21]  T. Soni Madhulatha,et al.  An Overview on Clustering Methods , 2012, ArXiv.