Towards a Science Base for Digital Governance

Since the middle of the twentieth century, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have greatly assisted public sector organisations in their quest to provide better services to citizens and businesses. Currently, at a worldwide scale, governmental units at any level and sector are accelerating their efforts to utilize ICTs, due to their tremendous potential to enhance service quality, openness, transparency and ultimately quality of life and sustainable growth. Digital Governance has been recognized as a well- established application domain studying the problems related to the needs of public sector organisations and proposing novel methods and frameworks for enhancing service quality through the use of ICT. Substantial progress has been made through European and national funded research in a number of areas, yet the lack of scientific rigor in the Digital Governance domain seems to hinder unlocking the real transformative value and full potential to all its stakeholders, from researchers to industry and SMEs. Such a scientific “science base” would document the existing knowledge and open the pathway for systematic and reproducible solutions to identified problems, without the danger of repeating research or missing opportunities for application. The current paper moves towards this research direction, to systematize the needed tasks for the establishment of the Digital Governance Science Base by presenting its initial structure, gaining knowledge for neighboring domains and proposing the next steps for its evolution.

[1]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Infusing scientific foundations into Enterprise Interoperability , 2012, Comput. Ind..

[2]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  The Evolving e-Governance Curriculum: A Worldwide mapping of Education Programs , 2019, ICEGOV.

[3]  Martin V. Curd,et al.  Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues , 1998 .

[4]  J. Kennedy.  The relationship between science and technology , 2001 .

[5]  W Bynum.  Science in medicine: when, how, and what , 2003 .

[6]  Peter Kokol.  Metamodeling: how, why and what? , 1993, SOEN.

[7]  Z. Fang.  E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development , 2002 .

[8]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Forums for electronic government scholars: Insights from a 2012/2013 study , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  The Three Generations of Electronic Government: From Service Provision to Open Data and to Policy Analytics , 2019, EGOV.

[10]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Revolutionizing Enterprise Interoperability through Scientific Foundations , 2014 .

[12]  T. Lotti,et al.  The history of medicine , 2017, Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift.

[13]  J. Elshtain.  Why science cannot stand alone , 2008, Theoretical medicine and bioethics.

[14]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Harvey Brooks,et al.  The relationship between science and technology , 1994 .

[16]  Christopher R. Bryant.  Gouvernement versus Gouvernance : structure versus processus. Introduction au dossier sur la Gouvernance Rurale , 2018 .

[17]  Zoi Lachana,et al.  IDENTIFYING THE DIFFERENT GENERATIONS OF EGOVERNMENT : AN ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK Ongoing Research paper New Directions for Digital Governance : Towards Government 3 . 0 , 2018 .

[18]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Scientific foundations training and entrepreneurship activities in the domain of ICT-enabled governance , 2018, DG.O.