Breeding habitat selection behaviors in heterogeneous environments: implications for modeling reintroduction

Animal movement and habitat selection behavior are important considerations in ecology, and remain a major issue for successful animal reintroductions. However, simple rules are often used to model movement or focus only on intrinsic environmental cues, neglecting recent insights in behavioral ecology on habitat selection processes. In particular, social information has been proposed as a widespread source of information for habitat evaluation. We investigated the role of explicit breeding habitat selection strategies on the establishment pattern of reintroduced populations and their persistence. We considered local movement at the scale of a single population. We constructed a spatially-implicit demographic model that considered five breeding habitat selection rules: 1) random, 2) intrinsic habitat quality, 3) avoidance of conspecifics, 4) presence of conspecifics and 5) reproductive success of conspecifics. The impact of breeding habitat selection was examined for different release methods under various levels of environmental heterogeneity levels, for both long and short-lived monogamous species. When heterogeneity between intrinsic habitat patch qualities is high, the persistence of reintroduced populations strongly depends on habitat selection strategies. Strategies based on intrinsic quality and conspecific reproductive success lead to a lower reintroduction failure risk than random, conspecific presence or avoidance-based strategies. Conspecific presence or avoidance-based strategies may aggregate individuals in suboptimal habitats. The release of adults seems to be more efficient independent of habitat selection strategy. We emphasize the crucial role of oriented habitat selection behavior and non ideal habitat selection in movement modeling, particularly for reintroduction.

[1]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Linking landscape patterns of resource distribution with models of aggregation in ovipositing stream insects , 2003 .

[2]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[3]  M. Gilpin,et al.  The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics , 1991 .

[4]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Effects of an Attractive Sink Leading into Maladaptive Habitat Selection , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[5]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[6]  T. Valone,et al.  Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Andy South,et al.  Dispersal in Spatially Explicit Population Models , 1999 .

[8]  Thierry Boulinier,et al.  The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[9]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.

[10]  Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology , 1997 .

[11]  F. Sarrazin,et al.  Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Jean Clobert,et al.  ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists , 1995 .

[13]  Richard R. Veit,et al.  Dispersal, Population Growth, and the Allee Effect: Dynamics of the House Finch Invasion of Eastern North America , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Debora Arlt,et al.  Nonideal breeding habitat selection: a mismatch between preference and fitness. , 2007, Ecology.

[15]  H. Kokko,et al.  Ecological traps in changing environments: Ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect , 2001 .

[16]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction , 2002 .

[17]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[18]  R. Pradel,et al.  Is the reintroduced white stork (Ciconia ciconia) population in Switzerland self-sustainable? , 2004 .

[19]  P. Seddon,et al.  Directions in reintroduction biology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Kenneth M. Portier,et al.  Modeling Florida panther movements in response to human attributes of the landscape and ecological settings , 2001 .

[21]  Denis Couvet,et al.  Releasing Adults versus Young in Reintroductions: Interactions between Demography and Genetics , 2004 .

[22]  G. Mace,et al.  Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals. , 1996 .

[23]  Stéphane Legendre,et al.  Demographic Approach to Releasing Adults versus Young in Reintroductions , 2000 .

[24]  T. Benton,et al.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[25]  J. Stamps,et al.  The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  J. Clobert,et al.  High Survival Estimates of Griffon Vultures (Gyps Fulvus Fulvus) in a Reintroduced Population , 1994 .

[27]  Marcus Frean The prisoner’s dilemma without synchrony , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Assessing the Data Requirements of Spatially Explicit Dispersal Models , 1997 .

[29]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  M. Baguette,et al.  Local populations and metapopulations are both natural and operational categories , 2003 .

[31]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Dealing with Uncertainty in Spatially Explicit Population Models , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[32]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[33]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes Aedon) , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[35]  E. Danchin,et al.  Breeding biology during establishment of a reintroduced Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus population , 2008 .

[36]  W. Kristan The role of habitat selection behavior in population dynamics: source -sink systems and ecological traps , 2003 .

[37]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Optimal movement strategies for social foragers in unpredictable environments. , 2006, Ecology.

[38]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Demographic Stochasticity and Social Mating System in the Process of Extinction of Small Populations: The Case of Passerines Introduced to New Zealand , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[39]  T. Dayan,et al.  Predicting the spatial dynamics of a reintroduced population: the persian fallow deer , 2005 .

[40]  J. A. Sedgwick SITE FIDELITY, TERRITORY FIDELITY, AND NATAL PHILOPATRY IN WILLOW FLYCATCHERS (EMPIDONAX TRAILLII) , 2004 .

[41]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes , 2004 .

[42]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Search and navigation in dynamic environments – from individual behaviors to population distributions , 2008 .

[43]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  MEASURING HABITAT QUALITY: A REVIEW , 2007 .

[44]  A. Wilson,et al.  Reintroduction of captive-born animals , 1994 .

[45]  Devra G. Kleiman,et al.  Reintroduction of Captive Mammals for Conservation Guidelines for reintroducing endangered species into the wild , 1989 .

[46]  J. Citta,et al.  Nest-site selection of passerines: effects of geographic scale and public and personal information. , 2007, Ecology.

[47]  J. Tella,et al.  The Role of Despotism and Heritability in Determining Settlement Patterns in the Colonial Lesser Kestrel , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[48]  Kenneth A. Schmidt,et al.  Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence , 2004 .

[49]  A. Møller Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow , 1994 .

[50]  Travis Dispersal functions and spatial models: expanding our dispersal toolbox , 2000 .

[51]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  Howard B. Stauffer,et al.  WHAT CAN HABITAT PREFERENCE MODELS TELL US? TESTS USING A VIRTUAL TROUT POPULATION , 2003 .

[53]  Doug P. Armstrong,et al.  Density-dependent population growth in a reintroduced population of North Island saddlebacks , 2005 .

[54]  A. Dobson,et al.  Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: Conspecific attraction and recruitment. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[55]  J. M. Scott,et al.  Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and Strategy , 1989, Science.