Prior Treatment Time Affects Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Burkard | Arie Nakhmani | S. Bhatia | Courtney P. Williams | A. Azuero | G. Rocque | K. Kenzik | P. G. Kandhare | A. Gilbert
[1] M. Burkard,et al. Visualization of Sequential Treatments in Metastatic Breast Cancer. , 2020, JCO clinical cancer informatics.
[2] P. Neven,et al. The Effect of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant on Overall Survival in Hormone Receptor–Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed on Endocrine Therapy—MONARCH 2 , 2019, JAMA oncology.
[3] Sandra D Griffith,et al. Characterizing the Feasibility and Performance of Real-World Tumor Progression End Points and Their Association With Overall Survival in a Large Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Data Set , 2019, JCO clinical cancer informatics.
[4] A. Abernethy,et al. Real‐world progression, treatment, and survival outcomes during rapid adoption of immunotherapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer , 2019, Cancer.
[5] M. Aapro,et al. Randomized phase II study evaluating weekly oral vinorelbine versus weekly paclitaxel in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative patients with advanced breast cancer (NorBreast-231 trial). , 2019, Breast.
[6] H. Rugo,et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA‐Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] S. Khozin,et al. Generating Real-World Tumor Burden Endpoints from Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of RECIST, Radiology-Anchored, and Clinician-Anchored Approaches for Abstracting Real-World Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2019, bioRxiv.
[8] S. Loi,et al. Predictors of prolonged benefit from palbociclib plus fulvestrant in women with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in PALOMA-3. , 2018, European journal of cancer.
[9] S. Bhatia,et al. Concordance with NCCN treatment guidelines: Relations with health care utilization, cost, and mortality in breast cancer patients with secondary metastasis , 2018, Cancer.
[10] S. Bhatia,et al. Impact of Nonconcordance With NCCN Guidelines on Resource Utilization, Cost, and Mortality in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer. , 2018, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[11] P. Fasching,et al. Phase III Randomized Study of Ribociclib and Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: MONALEESA-3. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[12] A. Abernethy,et al. Development and Validation of a High‐Quality Composite Real‐World Mortality Endpoint , 2018, Health services research.
[13] M. Goetz,et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[14] R. Porcher,et al. Differences in Treatment Effect Size Between Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Immunotherapy Trials: A Meta-Epidemiologic Study of Trials With Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] A. Deaton,et al. Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Trials , 2016, Social science & medicine.
[16] V. Kaklamani. Clinical Implications of the Progression-Free Survival Endpoint for Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, The oncologist.
[17] Amy P Abernethy,et al. Opportunities and challenges in leveraging electronic health record data in oncology. , 2016, Future oncology.
[18] J. Signorovitch,et al. Real-world patterns of endocrine therapy for metastatic hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer patients in the United States: 2002–2012 , 2014, Current medical research and opinion.
[19] M. Bonafede,et al. Patterns of treatment, healthcare utilization and costs by lines of therapy in metastatic breast cancer in a large insured US population. , 2013, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.
[20] M. Buyse,et al. Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[21] E. Perez,et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[22] S. Johnston,et al. Factors determining outcome after third line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, Breast.
[23] B. Overmoyer,et al. Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] J. Klijn,et al. Paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Study with cross-over. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[25] Edward J. Mulrow,et al. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985, Technometrics.
[26] S. Loi,et al. Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation. , 2017, New England Journal of Medicine.
[27] Xin Huang,et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.