A comparison of different input devices for a 3D environment

Abstract This paper presents a usability study comparing wand, voice, and two tablet-PC based interfaces across a task requiring three-dimensional surface exploration, information gathering and recall of information. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable interaction interface, among the ones implemented in a three-dimensional environment for Air Traffic Control, for interactive exploration of and gathering information about three-dimensional weather structures. Data concerning time, error rate, number of control actions as well as participants’ feedback on ease of learning, ease of use, frustration and perceived difficulty of the performed task were collected. The results indicate that the wand interface supported better performance when compared with the other interaction interfaces. Among the four interaction interfaces, the voice interface seems to present several limitations, mostly related to time lag in the voice recognition, which was judged by the subjects as a source of frustration.

[1]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  A Hybrid User Interface for Manipulation of Volumetric Medical Data , 2006, 3D User Interfaces (3DUI'06).

[2]  Joe Tullio,et al.  Usability analysis of 3D rotation techniques , 1997, UIST '97.

[3]  Richard A. Bolt,et al.  “Put-that-there”: Voice and gesture at the graphics interface , 1980, SIGGRAPH '80.

[4]  Donald B. Johnson,et al.  Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Andreas Rößler,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Input Devices in Virtual Environments , 1998, Designing Effective and Usable Multimedia Systems.

[6]  Ken Hinckley,et al.  A survey of design issues in spatial input , 1994, UIST '94.

[7]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Resizing beyond widgets: object resizing techniques for immersive virtual environments , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[8]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  User performance in relation to 3D input device design , 1998, COMG.

[9]  Achim Ebert,et al.  Dimensional Congruence for Interactive Visual Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2007, EuroVis.

[10]  Matthew Cooper,et al.  3D Visualization and 3D and Voice Interaction in Air Traffic Management , 2003 .

[11]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC , 2005 .

[12]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Human Behavior and Performance with Different Display Devices for Virtual Environments , 2002 .

[13]  Douglas A. Bowman,et al.  Interaction Techniques For Common Tasks In Immersive Virtual Environments - Design, Evaluation, And , 1999 .

[14]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments , 1998, Virtual Reality.

[15]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Evaluation of a multimodal interface for 3D terrain visualization , 2002, IEEE Visualization, 2002. VIS 2002..

[16]  Chris North,et al.  Information-rich virtual environments: theory, tools, and research agenda , 2003, VRST '03.

[17]  Novia Weiman,et al.  An Evaluation Of Input Devices For 3-D Computer Display Workstations , 1987, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[18]  D. Wormell,et al.  Advancements in 3D interactive devices for virtual environments , 2003 .