Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial.

ContextCoronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with autologous vein grafting is commonly performed. Progressive neointimal hyperplasia, however, contributes to considerable vein graft failure. Edifoligide is an oligonucleotide decoy that binds to and inhibits E2F transcription factors and thus may prevent neointimal hyperplasia and vein graft failure.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of pretreating vein grafts with edifoligide for patients undergoing CABG surgery.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 3014 patients undergoing primary CABG surgery with at least 2 planned saphenous vein grafts and without concomitant valve surgery, who were enrolled between August 2002 and October 2003 at 107 US sites.InterventionVein grafts were treated ex vivo with either edifoligide or placebo in a pressure-mediated delivery system. The first 2400 patients enrolled were scheduled for 12- to 18-month follow-up angiography.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary efficacy end point was angiographic vein graft failure (≥75% vein graft stenosis) occurring 12 to 18 months after CABG surgery. Other end points included other angiographic variables, adverse events through 30 days, and major adverse cardiac events.ResultsA total of 1920 patients (80%) either died (n = 91) or underwent follow-up angiography (n = 1829). Edifoligide had no effect on the primary end point of per patient vein graft failure (436 [45.2%] of 965 patients in the edifoligide group vs 442 [46.3%] of 955 patients in the placebo group; odds ratio, 0.96 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.80-1.14]; P = .66), on any secondary angiographic end point, or on the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year (101 [6.7%] of 1508 patients in the edifoligide group vs 121 [8.1%] of 1506 patients in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.64-1.08]; P = .16).ConclusionsFailure of at least 1 vein graft is quite common within 12 to 18 months after CABG surgery. Edifoligide is no more effective than placebo in preventing these events. Longer-term follow-up and additional research are needed to determine whether edifoligide has delayed beneficial effects, to understand the mechanisms and clinical consequences of vein graft failure, and to improve the durability of CABG surgery.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00042081.Published online November 13, 2005 (doi:10.1001/jama.294.19.joc50135).

[1]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival , 1994, The Lancet.

[2]  W. Keon,et al.  Coronary bypass graft fate. Angiographic study of 1,179 vein grafts early, one year, and five years after operation. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[4]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[5]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Disruptive visions: Biosurgery , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[6]  J. Copeland,et al.  Saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery and effects of antiplatelet therapy. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. , 1989, Circulation.

[7]  G. E. Green,et al.  Reoperation for coronary artery disease. 10 years of clinical follow-up. , 1988, Circulation.

[8]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations in Controlled Clinical Trials: Hypotheses Testing , 2004 .

[9]  J. Polak,et al.  Ex-vivo gene therapy of human vascular bypass grafts with E2F decoy: the PREVENT single-centre, randomised, controlled trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Mann,et al.  Therapeutic applications of transcription factor decoy oligonucleotides. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[12]  L. Campeau,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting with saphenous vein. , 1989, Circulation.

[13]  J. Wilson,et al.  Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule to porcine interposition vein grafts. , 1994, Circulation.

[14]  L. Liao,et al.  Relation of early saphenous vein graft failure to outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Bari Investigators Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic status. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[17]  T Sandor,et al.  Quantitative angiographic and statistical methods to assess serial changes in coronary luminal diameter and implications for atherosclerosis regression trials. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  A. Gotlieb,et al.  Stranger in a strange land: the pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. , 1991, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[19]  A. de Bruin,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of Mouse E2F8, a Novel Mammalian E2F Family Member Capable of Blocking Cellular Proliferation* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Mann,et al.  Long-term stabilization of vein graft wall architecture and prolonged resistance to experimental atherosclerosis after E2F decoy oligonucleotide gene therapy. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  F. Harrell,et al.  Observational Comparison of Event‐Free Survival With Medical and Surgical Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 20 Years of Follow‐up , 1992, Circulation.

[23]  E J Topol,et al.  Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. , 1998, Circulation.

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Cell cycle progression: new therapeutic target for vascular proliferative disease. , 1998, Circulation.

[25]  C David Naylor,et al.  A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Leon,et al.  Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  H. Hutchinson,et al.  Pressure-mediated oligonucleotide transfection of rat and human cardiovascular tissues. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Thomas E. Moritz,et al.  Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery , 2004 .

[29]  F. Harrell,et al.  The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease. A 15-year perspective. , 1989, JAMA.

[30]  P. Tsao,et al.  Genetic engineering of vein grafts resistant to atherosclerosis. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  T. Ogihara,et al.  A gene therapy strategy using a transcription factor decoy of the E2F binding site inhibits smooth muscle proliferation in vivo. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration , 1994, The Lancet.

[33]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Prevention of one-year vein-graft occlusion after aortocoronary- bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants , 1993, The Lancet.

[34]  R. Califf,et al.  Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[35]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. , 1984, Circulation.

[36]  W J Keon,et al.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[38]  M. Adams,et al.  Kinetics of vein graft hyperplasia: association with tangential stress. , 1987, Journal of vascular surgery.

[39]  P. Widimsky,et al.  One-Year Coronary Bypass Graft Patency: A Randomized Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery Angiographic Results of the PRAGUE-4 Trial , 2004, Circulation.

[40]  Robert J Anderson,et al.  Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  Robert M Califf,et al.  The PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial: study rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. , 2005, American heart journal.

[42]  R. Califf,et al.  Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. , 1995, Circulation.

[43]  Bradley G Hammill,et al.  A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[44]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[45]  B. Hoogwerf,et al.  Long-Term Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Aggressive Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Low-Dose Anticoagulation in the Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial , 2000 .