Using Feedback to Mitigate Coordination and Threshold Problems in Iterative Combinatorial Auctions

Package bids, i.e., bids on sets of items, are an essential aspect of combinatorial auctions. They can allow bidders to accurately express their preferences. However, bidders on packages consisting of few items are often unable to outbid provisionally winning bids on large packages. To resolve this, both coordination as well as cooperation are needed. Coordination, since smaller bidders need to bid on packages that are disjoint; cooperation, since typically bid increases from more than one bidder are required to overcome the threshold to outbid a larger package bid. The authors design an information system that supports the implementation of an iterative combinatorial auction; this system is specifically aimed at helping bidders overcome coordination and threshold problems. They study the effect of information feedback on the behavior of bidders in different auction settings. The authors test this in an experimental setting using human bidders, varying feedback from very basic information about provisionally winning bids/prices, to providing more advanced concepts such as winning and deadness levels, and coalitional feedback. The experiment indicates that coalitional feedback has a positive impact on economic efficiency in cases where difficult threshold problems arise; however, it appears to have an adverse effect when threshold problems are easy.

[1]  S. Raghavan,et al.  A combinatorial procurement auction featuring bundle price revelation without free-riding , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  J. Banks,et al.  Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: an experimental approach. , 1989, The Rand journal of economics.

[3]  Mark M. Bykowsky,et al.  Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem , 2000 .

[4]  Dries R. Goossens,et al.  Winner Determination in Geometrical Combinatorial Auctions , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Dan Levin,et al.  Efficiency and Synergy in a Multi-Unit Auction with and Without Package Bidding: An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[6]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Allocation Constraints: On Game Theoretical and Computational Properties of Generic Pricing Rules , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  S. Rassenti,et al.  A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation , 1982 .

[8]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Toward Comprehensive Real-Time Bidder Support in Iterative Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  M. Bichler,et al.  Do core-selecting Combinatorial Clock Auctions always lead to high efficiency? An experimental analysis of spectrum auction designs , 2013 .

[10]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[11]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Ascending Combinatorial Auctions with Risk Averse Bidders , 2016 .

[12]  Dries R. Goossens,et al.  Solids: A Combinatorial Auction for Real Estate , 2014, Interfaces.

[13]  Bart Vangerven Combinatorial auctions: theory, experiments, and practice , 2018, 4OR.

[14]  Ryuji Sano,et al.  Non-bidding equilibrium in an ascending core-selecting auction , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Jesse A. Schwartz,et al.  Collusive Bidding: Lessons from the FCC Spectrum Auctions , 2000 .

[16]  Martin Bichler,et al.  On the impact of package selection in combinatorial auctions: an experimental study in the context of spectrum auction design , 2012 .

[17]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[18]  Martin Bichler,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Price Combinatorial Auctions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Dan Levin,et al.  Efficiency and Synergy in a Multi-Unit Auction with and Without Package Bidding: An Experimental Study , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Ascending Prices and Package Bidding: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis , 2010 .

[21]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  An Experimental Test of Flexible Combinatorial Spectrum Auction Formats , 2010 .

[22]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  Effect of Information Feedback on Bidder Behavior in Continuous Combinatorial Auctions , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions , 2000, EC '00.

[24]  M. Goh,et al.  Multiobjective Combinatorial Auctions in Transportation Procurement , 2014 .

[25]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  An Equilibrium Analysis of the Simultaneous Ascending Auction , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[26]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Coalition-Based Pricing in Ascending Combinatorial Auctions , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..