Introductory biology textbooks under-represent scientific process.

Attrition of undergraduates from Biology majors is a long-standing problem. Introductory courses that fail to engage students or spark their curiosity by emphasizing the open-ended and creative nature of biological investigation and discovery could contribute to student detachment from the field. Our hypothesis was that introductory biology books devote relatively few figures to illustration of the design and interpretation of experiments or field studies, thereby de-emphasizing the scientific process. To investigate this possibility, we examined figures in six Introductory Biology textbooks published in 2008. On average, multistep scientific investigations were presented in fewer than 5% of the hundreds of figures in each book. Devoting such a small percentage of figures to the processes by which discoveries are made discourages an emphasis on scientific thinking. We suggest that by increasing significantly the illustration of scientific investigations, textbooks could support undergraduates' early interest in biology, stimulate the development of design and analytical skills, and inspire some students to participate in investigations of their own.

[1]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  An Emerging Conceptualization of Epistemological Beliefs and Their Role in Learning , 2019, Beliefs About Text and Instruction with Text.

[2]  Russell N. Carney,et al.  Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text , 2002 .

[3]  D. Allchin.  Scientific myth-conceptions† , 2003 .

[4]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[5]  Hope J. Hartman.  Developing Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge and Skills , 2001 .

[6]  R. Mayer.  Systematic Thinking Fostered by Illustrations in Scientific Text , 1989 .

[7]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[8]  Sally G. Hoskins,et al.  . : less is more in teaching science , 2009 .

[9]  W. Howard Levie,et al.  Effects of text illustrations: A review of research , 1982 .

[10]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective , 2005 .

[11]  J. Bransford,et al.  How students learn : history, mathematics, and science in the classroom , 2005 .

[12]  Mary Koppal,et al.  Meeting the challenge of science literacy: project 2061 efforts to improve science education. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[13]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[14]  W. K. Purves.  Life: The Science of Biology , 1985 .

[15]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[16]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[17]  J. Mathewson.  Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[18]  Richard McGee,et al.  Identifying future scientists: predicting persistence into research training. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[19]  Erika G. Offerdahl,et al.  Comparison of Views of the Nature of Science between Natural Science and Nonscience Majors , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  Peter Armbruster,et al.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[21]  N. Vaidya,et al.  Science Teaching for the 21st Century , 2002 .

[22]  Donald Kennedy,et al.  Doing More for Kate , 2005, Science.

[23]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[24]  Marlene Schommer.  Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[25]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The Nature of Scientific Thinking as Reflected by the Work of Biologists & by Biology Textbooks , 1992 .

[26]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  A Profile of High School Biology Textbooks Using Scientific Literacy Recommendations , 1996 .

[27]  Gerald H. Krockover,et al.  IDEAS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE HELD BY UNDERGRADUATE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE STUDENTS , 2008 .

[28]  Richard Pulmones.  Linking Students' Epistemological Beliefs with their Metacognition in a Chemistry Classroom , 2010 .

[29]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Beliefs About Science: How Does Science Instruction Contribute? , 2001 .

[30]  Cecie Starr,et al.  Biology: The unity and diversity of life , 1978 .

[31]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2004 .

[32]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[33]  William G. Perry,et al.  Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years , 1999 .

[34]  William B Wood,et al.  Teaching more by lecturing less. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[35]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse , 2010, Science.

[36]  James E Johnson,et al.  Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[37]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Depth versus Breadth: How Content Coverage in High School Science Courses Relates to Later Success in College Science Coursework. , 2009 .

[38]  Eleanor Dantzler Siebert,et al.  College Pathways to the Science Education Standards , 2001 .

[39]  B. Hofer,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college , 2004 .