Laboratory-scale validation of a DEM model of screening processes with circular vibration

Abstract In this work, DEM results and experimental data from a specially designed circularly vibrating screening model are compared quantitatively under a range of operating conditions. The validation is carried out in two aspects. First, the motion of tracked particles is recorded using high-speed dynamic analysis system and their velocities are compared with DEM results. Second, the total screening performance indexes are compared to those predicted by DEM. Overall agreements for both spherical and non-spherical particle models are observed in both the motion of individual particles and the screening performance quantities. Generally, better agreements are found for non-spherical particle model with the particle shape reasonably considered. Quantitatively, spherical particle model is less accurate because the simplification of particle shape leads to good mobility and over-prediction of velocity and screening efficiency. The validity of the DEM model of the screening process is hence approved. The validated DEM model can be applied to perform extensive numerical studies to achieve optimal performance and better operation of such complicated and important processes in mineral processing.

[1]  Xin Tong,et al.  Modeling and parameter optimization for the design of vibrating screens , 2015 .

[2]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Testing the validity of the spherical DEM model in simulating real granular screening processes , 2012 .

[3]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  Modeling of Screening Processes with the Discrete Element Method Involving Non‐Spherical Particles , 2014 .

[4]  Runyu Yang,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: A review of major applications and findings , 2008 .

[5]  Hong Wang,et al.  DEM simulation of particle flow on a single deck banana screen , 2013 .

[6]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  Review and benchmarking of process models for batch screening based on discrete element simulations , 2015 .

[7]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Using SPH one-way coupled to DEM to model wet industrial banana screens , 2011 .

[8]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Separation performance of double deck banana screens – Part 1: Flow and separation for different accelerations , 2009 .

[9]  Aibing Yu,et al.  DEM study of the flow of cohesive particles in a screw feeder , 2014 .

[10]  Wei Ge,et al.  Granular flow in a rotating drum with gaps in the side wall , 2008 .

[11]  Yuemin Zhao,et al.  Simulation of the screening process on a circularly vibrating screen using 3D-DEM , 2011 .

[12]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Separation performance of double deck banana screens Part 2: Quantitative predictions , 2009 .

[13]  Liu Chusheng,et al.  Numerical simulation on segregation process of particles using 3D discrete element method , 2010 .

[14]  Xin Tong,et al.  Application of the DEM to screening process: a 3D simulation , 2009 .

[15]  Liu Chusheng,et al.  Discrete element simulation of mechanical properties of wet granular pile , 2014 .

[16]  Xin Tong,et al.  Modeling screening efficiency with vibrational parameters based on DEM 3D simulation , 2010 .

[17]  Xin Tong,et al.  Screening efficiency and screen length of a linear vibrating screen using DEM 3D simulation , 2011 .

[18]  Lala Zhao,et al.  Influence of vibration mode on the screening process , 2013 .

[19]  Colin Webb,et al.  Discrete particle motion on sieves—a numerical study using the DEM simulation , 2003 .

[20]  F. Maio,et al.  Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes , 2004 .

[21]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  A study on the validity of the multi-sphere Discrete Element Method , 2008 .

[22]  A. Yu,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: Theoretical developments , 2007 .

[23]  A. Farzanegan,et al.  Investigation of screening performance of banana screens using LIGGGHTS DEM solver , 2015 .

[24]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Understanding factors leading to bias for falling-stream cutters using discrete element modelling with non-spherical particles , 2008 .

[25]  Jianzhang Xiao,et al.  Characteristics and efficiency of a new vibrating screen with a swing trace , 2013 .

[26]  Zheng Ma,et al.  Discrete-element method simulation of agricultural particles' motion in variable-amplitude screen box , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[27]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Modeling of Particle Flow and Sieving Behavior on a Vibrating Screen: From Discrete Particle Simulation to Process Performance Prediction , 2013 .

[28]  Jianzhang Xiao,et al.  Particle stratification and penetration of a linear vibrating screen by the discrete element method , 2012 .

[29]  A. Yu,et al.  Rolling friction in the dynamic simulation of sandpile formation , 1999 .

[30]  Liu Chusheng,et al.  Numerical simulation of particle segregation behavior in different vibration modes , 2010 .

[31]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  Benchmarking of process models for continuous screening based on discrete element simulations , 2015 .

[32]  Kejun Dong,et al.  DEM simulation of particle flow on a multi-deck banana screen , 2009 .

[33]  Zhao,et al.  Numerical Study of Collision and Penetration Behavior Between Particles and Screen Plate , 2006 .

[34]  Jidong Zhao,et al.  Coupled CFD–DEM simulation of fluid–particle interaction in geomechanics , 2013 .

[35]  Mojtaba Ghadiri,et al.  Analysis of flowability of cohesive powders using Distinct Element Method , 2005 .

[36]  Colin Webb,et al.  A Numerical Simulation of Separation of Crop Seeds by Screening—Effect of Particle Bed Depth , 2002 .

[37]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge , 2002 .