Improvement of Electric Aircraft Endurance through Propeller Optimization via BEM-CFD Methodology

An exhaustive optimization method is developed to minimize the power consumption for a propeller-driven electrical aircraft. The method finds the optimal value for a wide range of geometrical and operational parameters for a target thrust and airspeed. The optimization routine employs BEM for propeller predictions fed with aerodynamic airfoil data obtained from a proposed combined CFD-Montgomerie method which is also validated, furthermore several corrections to account for compressibility, three dimensional, viscous and Reynolds number effects are implemented. This BEM model showed an adequate fitting with experimental data. Additionally, Goldstein optimization via Vortex Theory is employed to design pitch and chord distributions minimizing the induced losses of the propeller. The optimization algorithm is validated through a study case where an existent optimization problem is approached leading to very similar results. Some trends and insights are obtained and discussed from the study case regarding the design of an optimal propulsion system. Finally, CFD simulations of the study case are carried out showing a slight relative error of BEM.

[1]  Donghun Park,et al.  Design and Performance Evaluation of Propeller for Solar-Powered High-Altitude Long-Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2018 .

[2]  M. Sriti Improved Blade Element Momentum theory (BEM) for Predicting the Aerodynamic Performances of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade (HAWT) , 2018 .

[3]  James W. Gregory,et al.  Blade Element Momentum Modeling of Low-Reynolds Electric Propulsion Systems , 2017 .

[4]  José C. Páscoa,et al.  XFOIL vs CFD performance predictions for high lift low Reynolds number airfoils , 2016 .

[5]  Andrew Ning,et al.  Comparison of Airfoil Precomputational Analysis Methods for Optimization of Wind Turbine Blades , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[6]  Kamran Mohseni,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Long -Duration Electric MAVs , 2005 .

[7]  Ohad Gur,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Quiet Propeller , 2008 .

[8]  Ohad Gur,et al.  Optimizing Electric Propulsion Systems for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2009 .

[9]  Tahir Yavuz,et al.  CFD vs. XFOIL of airfoil analysis at low reynolds numbers , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA).

[10]  Zhi Tao,et al.  Turbulence modeling of deep dynamic stall at relatively low Reynolds number , 2012 .

[11]  Koju Hiraki,et al.  AIRFOIL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF HIGH PERFORMANCE, LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER PROPELLERS , 2018, International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH.

[12]  James G. Coder,et al.  Comparisons of Theoretical Methods for Predicting Airfoil Aerodynamic Characteristics , 2014 .

[13]  Eduardo José Novaes Menezes,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT TURBULENCE MODELS ON A CFD SIMULATION OF AIR FLOW PAST A S814 AIRFOIL , 2020, Brazilian Journal of Development.

[14]  S. Goldstein On the Vortex Theory of Screw Propellers , 1929 .

[15]  Ohad Gur,et al.  Optimization of Propeller Based Propulsion System , 2009 .