Multi-resolution and temporal characterization of land-use classes in a Mediterranean wetland with land-cover fractions

Four different methods for analysing land-use and land-cover fractions at multiple scales, namely composite operator, t-test, Dutilleul’s modified t-test and ternary diagrams of physical models for process pathways, were applied to sets of multi-resolution images in order to evaluate the usefulness of coarse-resolution satellite data (e.g. the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer; MODIS) in obtaining similar results to those obtainable with moderate-resolution satellite data (e.g. Landsat). A spectral-mixture model based on three endmembers (soil, vegetation and water) was used to determine the land-cover fractions of the main land-use classes of a wetland in southeast Spain. The land-use map was produced by applying the unsupervised k-means classification method to the moderate-resolution image. Spatial and temporal changes in the mixture fractions at multiple resolutions and their corresponding land-cover fraction maps were assessed. Three different t-tests (paired-samples, independent-samples and Dutilleul’s modified t-tests) were used to evaluate the effects of pixel aggregation on land-cover fractions and land-use maps in terms of surface-area estimations. Ternary plots of land-use classes characterized by land-cover fractions were used to visualize environmental processes pathways describing temporal changes in the landscape. The results obtained with moderate- and coarse-resolution data were not significantly different from each other. Land-use and land-cover surface-area estimations were not significantly different between Landsat moderate-resolution (30 m) and Landsat resampled coarse-resolution (300 m) data. Spatial autocorrelation had an important effect when comparing Landsat moderate-resolution (30 m) with MODIS coarse-resolution (250 m) data. In order to minimize these effects Dutilleul’s modified t-test was applied for the comparison of Landsat with MODIS image data. However, this test did not reveal significant differences between both datasets, whereas with the ordinary t-test, significant differences were found, which suggest the existence of a bias by spatial autocorrelation that must be taken into account for up-scaling or down-scaling of remote-sensing data. The results suggest the possibility of using coarse-resolution images (MODIS) to characterize environmental changes with a similar accuracy to those of moderate-resolution images (Landsat), as long as potential spatial autocorrelation effects are taken into account. This finding indicates that a substantial reduction in the costs of conducting wetland management and monitoring tasks can be achieved by using free or low-cost coarse-resolution satellite images.

[1]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Remote Sensing of Landscapes with Spectral Images , 2006 .

[2]  C. Small,et al.  Estimation and vicarious validation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis , 2006 .

[3]  N. A. Quarmby,et al.  Linear mixture modelling applied to AVHRR data for crop area estimation , 1992 .

[4]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Subpixel classification of Bald Cypress and Tupelo Gum trees in thematic mapper imagery , 1997 .

[5]  J Richards,et al.  Computer processing of remotely-sensed images: An introduction , 1990 .

[6]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  A generalized cross‐tabulation matrix to compare soft‐classified maps at multiple resolutions , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Ecography 25: 601 -- 615, 2002 , 2022 .

[8]  J. D. de Paz,et al.  Combined use of GIS and environmental indicators for assessment of chemical, physical and biological soil degradation in a Spanish Mediterranean region. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[10]  Christopher Small,et al.  The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space , 2004 .

[11]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  On the choice of spatial and categorical scale in remote sensing land cover classification , 2005 .

[12]  T. Schmid,et al.  Application of spectroscopial, hyperspectral and multispectral data to study wetlands in semi-arid environments (Central Spain) , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[13]  B. Markham,et al.  Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro,et al.  The least-squares mixing models to generate fraction images derived from remote sensing multispectral data , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[16]  Stephen J. Walsh,et al.  Remote sensing of forested wetlands: application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[17]  L. Ferreira,et al.  Spectral linear mixture modelling approaches for land cover mapping of tropical savanna areas in Brazil , 2007 .

[18]  Y. E. Shimabukuro,et al.  Identification and mapping of the Amazon habitats using a mixing model , 1997 .

[19]  A. Rogers,et al.  Reducing signature variability in unmixing coastal marsh Thematic Mapper scenes using spectral indices , 2004 .

[20]  A. María.,et al.  L'Albufera d'Elx: Evolución cuaternaria y reconstrucción paleoambiental a partir del estudio de los foraminíferos fósiles. , 2001 .

[21]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  P. M. Mather,et al.  A spectral library for a semi-arid wetland and its application to studies of wetland degradation using hyperspectral and multispectral data , 2004 .

[23]  R. Costanza MODEL GOODNESS OF FIT: A MULTIPLE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE , 1989 .

[24]  P. Chavez Radiometric calibration of Landsat Thematic Mapper multispectral images , 1989 .

[25]  Thomas Schmid,et al.  Multisensor approach to determine changes of wetland characteristics in semiarid environments (central Spain) , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .

[27]  Donald E. Sabol,et al.  Predicting The Spectral Detectability Of Surface Materials Using Spectral Mixture Analysis , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  J. Smith,et al.  Fraction Images Derived from Landsat TM and MSS Data for Monitoring Reforested Areas , 1995 .

[29]  Juan Sánchez Díaz,et al.  Combined use of GIS and environmental indicators for assessment , 2006 .

[30]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[31]  S. Sanjeevi,et al.  A comparison of the classification of wetland characteristics by linear spectral mixture modelling and traditional hard classifiers on multispectral remotely sensed imagery in southern India , 2006 .

[32]  Stacy L. Ozesmi,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[33]  A. Hastings,et al.  Mapping marshland vegetation of San Francisco Bay, California, using hyperspectral data , 2005 .

[34]  Victor Haertel,et al.  Spectral linear mixing model in low spatial resolution image data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Fausto W. Acerbi-Junior,et al.  Scaling dimensions in spectroscopy of soil and vegetation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[36]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[37]  Gyanesh Chander,et al.  Revised Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper Radiometric Calibration , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[38]  R. Pech,et al.  Reflectance modelling and the derivation of vegetation indices for an Australian semi-arid shrubland , 1986 .

[39]  Elisabetta Binaghi,et al.  A fuzzy set-based accuracy assessment of soft classification , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[40]  M. Canty,et al.  Unsupervised classification of satellite imagery: Choosing a good algorithm , 2002 .

[41]  P. Clifford,et al.  Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes , 1993 .

[42]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output , 1992 .

[43]  E. D. Martonne L'indice d'aridité , 1926 .

[44]  P. Chavez Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .