Comodulation Masking Release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers
暂无分享,去创建一个
Maria Schuster | Stefan Zirn | John-Martin Hempel | Werner Hemmert | M. Schuster | W. Hemmert | S. Zirn | J. Hempel
[1] Israel Nelken,et al. Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.
[2] Stephan M. A. Ernst,et al. Effects of sequential streaming on auditory masking using psychoacoustics and auditory evoked potentials , 2012, Hearing Research.
[3] J W Hall,et al. Comodulation masking release for speech stimuli. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Brian Roberts,et al. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners , 2007, Hearing Research.
[5] Joseph W. Hall,et al. Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] R. Altschuler,et al. Mechanism of electrical stimulation-induced neuroprotection: effects of verapamil on protection of primary auditory afferents , 2003, Brain Research.
[7] Bernhard U Seeber,et al. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] B C Moore,et al. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] B C Moore,et al. Co-modulation masking release: spectro-temporal pattern analysis in hearing. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[10] T. Dau,et al. Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Daniel Pressnitzer,et al. The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.
[12] R. Snyder,et al. Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.
[13] Albert S. Bregman,et al. The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .
[14] Brian Roberts,et al. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Margaret W Skinner,et al. Nucleus® 24 Advanced Encoder Conversion Study: Performance versus Preference , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[16] F. Zeng,et al. Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation , 1992, Hearing Research.
[17] T D Carrell,et al. The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[18] Brian C J Moore,et al. Comodulation masking release: effects of training and experimental design on use of within- and across-channel cues. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] H. Spoendlin,et al. Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. , 1975, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[20] B. Epp,et al. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Mounya Elhilali,et al. Competing Streams at the Cocktail Party: Exploring the Mechanisms of Attention and Temporal Integration , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[22] Ray Meddis,et al. Physiological Correlates of Comodulation Masking Release in the Mammalian Ventral Cochlear Nucleus , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[23] Blake S. Wilson,et al. Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.
[24] Robert K Shepherd,et al. Long‐term sensorineural hearing loss induces functional changes in the rat auditory nerve , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.
[25] S. Rice. Mathematical analysis of random noise , 1944 .
[26] A. Oxenham. Pitch Perception and Auditory Stream Segregation: Implications for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[27] Soha N. Garadat,et al. Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users , 2011, Hearing Research.
[28] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] M. Dorman,et al. A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[30] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Brian C J Moore,et al. Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] M P Haggard,et al. Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] J H Grose,et al. Cochlear hearing loss and the processing of modulation: effects of temporal asynchrony. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] B. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .
[36] Bastian Epp,et al. Superposition of masking releases , 2008, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.
[37] Antje Ihlefeld,et al. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.