Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial

Importance The addition of receptor-neprilysin inhibition to standard therapy, including a renin-angiotensin system blocker, has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with standard therapy alone. The long-term absolute risk reduction from angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy, and whether it merits widespread use among diverse subpopulations, has not been well described. Objective To calculate estimated 5-year number needed to treat (NNT) values overall and for different subpopulations for the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants Overall and subpopulation 5-year NNT values were estimated for different end points using data from PARADIGM-HF, a double-blind, randomized trial of sacubitril-valsartan vs enalapril. This multicenter, international study included 8399 men and women with HFrEF (ejection fraction, ⩽40%). The study began in December 2009 and ended in March 2014. Analyses began in March 2018. Interventions Random assignment to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril. Main Outcomes and Measures Cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. Results The final cohort of 8399 individuals included 1832 women (21.8%) and 5544 white individuals (66.0%), with a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (11.4) years. The 5-year estimated NNT for the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization with ARNI therapy incremental to ACEI therapy in the overall cohort was 14. The 5-year estimated NNT values were calculated for different clinically relevant subpopulations and ranged from 12 to 19. The 5-year estimated NNT for all-cause mortality in the overall cohort with ARNI incremental to ACEI was 21, with values ranging from 16 to 31 among different subgroups. Compared with imputed placebo, the 5-year estimated NNT for all-cause mortality with ARNI was 11. The 5-year estimated NNT values were also calculated for other HFrEF therapies compared with controls from landmark trials for all-cause mortality and were found to be 18 for ACEI, 24 for angiotensin receptor blockers, 8 for &bgr;-blockers, 15 for mineralocorticoid antagonists, 14 for implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 14 for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Conclusions and Relevance The 5-year estimated NNT with ARNI therapy incremental to ACEI therapy overall and for clinically relevant subpopulations of patients with HFrEF are comparable with those for well-established HF therapeutics. These data further support guideline recommendations for use of ARNI therapy among eligible patients with HFrEF.

[1]  C. Kumana,et al.  Gauging the impact of statins using number needed to treat. , 1999, JAMA.

[2]  J. Hausleiter,et al.  Role of percutaneous edge-to-edge repair in secondary mitral regurgitation after MITRA-FR and COAPT , 2019, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[3]  Fach,et al.  Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in-Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) , 1999, The Lancet.

[4]  Karl Swedberg,et al.  Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[5]  R. Touyz,et al.  Novel Therapeutic Approaches Targeting the Renin-Angiotensin System and Associated Peptides in Hypertension and Heart Failure , 2019, Pharmacological Reviews.

[6]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[7]  J. McMurray,et al.  Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Wing W. Chan,et al.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[9]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  A putative placebo analysis of the effects of LCZ696 on clinical outcomes in heart failure , 2014, European heart journal.

[10]  M. Møller,et al.  Is prophylaxis worse than treatment in the ICU? , 2019, Intensive Care Medicine.

[11]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[12]  Gianni Tognoni,et al.  Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Women and Men: A Sex-Specific Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2006, JAMA.

[13]  John L Sapp,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Nelson,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Combination Therapy Compared With Enalapril for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[16]  S. Solomon,et al.  Estimating the Long-Term Treatment Benefits of Sacubitril-Valsartan. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Douglas L Packer,et al.  Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  S. Solomon,et al.  Potential Mortality Reduction With Optimal Implementation of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor Therapy in Heart Failure. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.