Embodied Carbon Tools for Architects and Clients Early in the Design Process

Alterations of a building design are easier facilitated in the early stages of a building design where less strategic parameters are fixed. Tools for environmental assessments are aimed for decision support but are often used late in the building design process because the calculations rely on detailed volumes of material uses. This paradox can be addressed by using carbon profiles of a large set of prespecified, precalculated building elements together with limited, geometric input data of the early building design. The simplified approach allows for embodied carbon modelling within minutes and at a 5–10% margin of error compared to more detailed tools.

[1]  Shady Attia,et al.  The ‘Architect-friendliness’ Of Six Building Performance Simulation Tools: A Comparative Study , 2011 .

[2]  Rob Marsh,et al.  LCA profiles for building components: strategies for the early design process , 2016 .

[3]  Alan Coday,et al.  A conceptual framework of the interface between the design and construction processes , 2011 .

[4]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  NativeLCA - a systematic approach for the selection of environmental datasets as generic data: application to construction products in a national context , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Service Life Prediction , 2014 .

[6]  Appu Haapio,et al.  Environmental effect of structural solutions and building materials to a building , 2008 .

[7]  Shady Attia,et al.  Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design , 2012 .

[8]  Arno Schlueter,et al.  Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages , 2009 .

[9]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  Reducing embodied carbon during the design process of buildings , 2015 .

[10]  Paulo Santos,et al.  A macro-component approach for the assessment of building sustainability in early stages of design , 2014 .

[11]  Libby Schweber,et al.  Comparing the fit between BREEAM assessment and design processes , 2014 .

[12]  J. Ravetz.  State of the stock--What do we know about existing buildings and their future prospects? , 2008 .

[13]  Rob Marsh,et al.  Architecture and energy: questioning regulative and architectural paradigms for Danish low-energy housing , 2011 .

[14]  Yuting Sun,et al.  The development of life-cycle costing for buildings , 2016 .

[15]  Alexander Hollberg,et al.  LCA in architectural design—a parametric approach , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[16]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[17]  Bernardette Soust-Verdaguer,et al.  Simplification in life cycle assessment of single-family houses: A review of recent developments , 2016 .