Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study

Using a database of potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access journals, the objective of this research is to study the penetration of predatory publications in the Brazilian academic system and the profile of authors in a cross-section empirical study. Based on a massive amount of publications from Brazilian researchers of all disciplines during the 2000–2015 period, we were able to analyze the extent of predatory publications using an econometric modeling. Descriptive statistics indicate that predatory publications represent a small overall proportion, but grew exponentially in the last 5 years. Departing from prior studies, our analysis shows that experienced researchers with a high number of non-indexed publications and PhD obtained locally are more likely to publish in predatory journals. Further analysis shows that once a journal regarded as predatory is listed in the local ranking system, the Qualis, it starts to receive more publications than non-predatory ones.

[1]  Alexander M Clark,et al.  Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals. , 2017, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  Aceil Al-Khatib,et al.  Protecting Authors from Predatory Journals and Publishers , 2016 .

[3]  Derek Pyne The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School , 2017 .

[4]  Jingfeng Xia,et al.  Predatory journals and their article publishing charges , 2015, Learn. Publ..

[5]  Richard Van Noorden Brazilian citation scheme outed. , 2013, Nature.

[6]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position - A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Charlotte Haug,et al.  The downside of open-access publishing. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures , 2015 .

[9]  A. Manca,et al.  Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation. , 2017, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Kamran Abbasi The debate around open-access publishing , 2012, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[11]  Timothy J. Perri,et al.  Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals , 2016, Scientometrics.

[12]  Dragan Djuric,et al.  Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection , 2014, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[13]  J. Beall What I learned from predatory publishers , 2017, Biochemia Medica.

[14]  Jakob B. Madsen Book review: Basic Econometrics, Damodar N. Gujarati, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995 , 1998 .

[15]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Predatory publishers are corrupting open access , 2012, Nature.

[16]  B. Björk,et al.  ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[17]  John D Bowman,et al.  Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences , 2014, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[18]  Z. Dvir,et al.  The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology , 2017, Neuroscience.

[19]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender? , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Jingfeng Xia,et al.  Who publishes in “predatory” journals? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Declan Butler,et al.  Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing , 2013, Nature.

[22]  W. E. Nwagwu Open Access in the Developing Regions: Situating the Altercations About Predatory Publishing / L’accès libre dans les régions en voie de développement : Situation de la controverse concernant les pratiques d’édition déloyales , 2016 .

[23]  Jill Cirasella,et al.  Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers , 2015 .

[24]  R. Price,et al.  Artemether-lumefantrine treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of day 7 lumefantrine concentrations and therapeutic response using individual patient data , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[25]  W. Strielkowski Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall's List? , 2017, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Medical Publishing Triage – Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers , 2013, Annals of medicine and surgery.

[28]  Denis Borenstein,et al.  The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[29]  Nafiz Zaman Shuva,et al.  Faculty members’ perceptions and use of open access journals , 2016 .

[30]  Audra E. Cox,et al.  The Dark Side of Publishing: Promoting Ethics in AJP 2003 to 2008 , 2012 .

[31]  B. Björk,et al.  The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  Chris Brooks,et al.  Gender and the Evaluation of Research , 2014 .

[33]  Agnieszka Sorokowska,et al.  Predatory journals recruit fake editor , 2017, Nature.

[34]  Ljubica Ivanovic-Bibic,et al.  Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review , 2014 .

[35]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers , 2017, Scientometrics.

[36]  Ayokunle Olumuyiwa Omobowale,et al.  Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria , 2014 .

[37]  Richard Van Noorden Brazilian citation scheme outed , 2013, Nature.