Energy Retrofitting of a Buildings’ Envelope: Assessment of the Environmental, Economic and Energy (3E) Performance of a Cork-Based Thermal Insulating Rendering Mortar

This paper presents an environmental, economic and energy (3E) assessment of an energy retrofitting of the external walls of a flat of an average building with the most current characteristics used in Portugal. For this intervention, a cork-based (as recycled lightweight aggregate) TIRM (Thermal Insulating Rendering Mortar) was considered. The declared unit was 1 m2 of an external wall for a 50-year study period and the energy and economic costs and savings, as well as the environmental impacts, were analytically modelled and compared for two main alternatives: the reference wall without any intervention and the energetically rehabilitated solution with the application of TIRM. Walls with improved energy performance (with TIRM) show lower economic and environmental impacts: reductions from 6% to 32% in carbon emissions, non-renewable energy consumption and costs during the use stage, which depends on the thickness and relative place where TIRM layers are applied. A worse energy performance is shown by reference walls (without TIRM) during the use stage (corresponding to energy used for heating and cooling), while the improved walls present economic and environmental impacts due to the application of TIRM (including the production, transport and application into the building) that do not exist in the reference walls. The comparison between reference walls and energy-retrofitted ones revealed that reference wall become be more expensive when more demanding operational energy requirements are analysed over a 50-year period, even if renewable materials are more expensive.

[1]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Retrofitting a Building’s Envelope: Sustainability Performance of ETICS with ICB or EPS , 2019 .

[2]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition—A case study , 2011 .

[3]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[4]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBTool PTH , 2011 .

[5]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  NativeLCA - a systematic approach for the selection of environmental datasets as generic data: application to construction products in a national context , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Joaquim Ferreira,et al.  In search of better energy performance in the Portuguese buildings—The case of the Portuguese regulation , 2011 .

[7]  R. Baumgartner,et al.  The Third Wave of LCA as the “Decade of Consolidation” , 2019, Sustainability.

[8]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods , 2012 .

[9]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Uncertainty modelling of service life and environmental performance to reduce risk in building design decisions , 2015 .

[10]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Environmental impacts and benefits of the end-of-life of building materials – calculation rules, results and contribution to a “cradle to cradle” life cycle , 2014 .

[11]  Borong Lin,et al.  LIFE CYCLE GREEN COST ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR GREEN BUILDING DESIGN , 2007 .

[12]  Ben Amor,et al.  Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2019, Sustainability.

[13]  S. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle energy of single landed houses in Indonesia , 2008 .

[14]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental impact of experimental buildings with different constructive systems using Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[15]  T. M. Leung,et al.  A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings , 2015 .

[16]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  From the new European Standards to an environmental, energy and economic assessment of building assemblies from cradle-to-cradle (3E-C2C) , 2013 .

[17]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings , 2013 .

[18]  Inês Flores-Colen,et al.  Economic and Energy Life Cycle Assessment of aerogel-based thermal renders , 2017 .

[19]  Borong Lin,et al.  Integrated assessment method for building life cycle environmental and economic performance , 2008 .

[20]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Life-cycle impact ‘cradle to cradle’ of building assemblies , 2014 .

[21]  André Stephan,et al.  Reducing the total life cycle energy demand of recent residential buildings in Lebanon , 2014 .

[22]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Indonesian residential high rise buildings: A life cycle energy assessment , 2009 .

[23]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects , 2013 .