Knowledge structure transition in library and information science: topic modeling and visualization

The purpose of this research is to identify topics in library and information science (LIS) using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and to visualize the knowledge structure of the field as consisting of specific topics and its transition from 2000–2002 to 2015–2017. The full text of 1648 research articles from five peer-reviewed representative LIS journals in these two periods was analyzed by using LDA. A total of 30 topics in each period were labeled based on the frequency of terms and the contents of the articles. These topics were plotted on a two-dimensional map using LDAvis and categorized based on their location and characteristics in the plots. Although research areas in some forms were persistent with which discovered in previous studies, they were crucial to the transition of the knowledge structure in LIS and had the following three features: (1) The Internet became the premise of research in LIS in 2015–2017. (2) Theoretical approach or empirical work can be considered as a factor in the transition of the knowledge structure in some categories. (3) The topic diversity of the five core LIS journals decreased from the 2000–2002 to 2015–2017.

[1]  Soohyung Joo,et al.  Topic Analysis of the Research Domain in Knowledge Organization: A Latent Dirichlet Allocation Approach , 2018 .

[2]  Howard D. White,et al.  Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Wei Wei,et al.  Textual analysis and visualization of research trends in data mining for electronic health records , 2017 .

[4]  T. E. Nisonger,et al.  The Perception of Library and Information Science Journals by LIS Education Deans and ARL Library Directors: A Replication of the Kohl–Davis Study , 2005 .

[5]  K. Pettigrew,et al.  The Use of Theory in Information Science Research. , 2001 .

[6]  Bin Ma,et al.  Topic modeling for conference analytics , 2015, INTERSPEECH.

[7]  John D. Lafferty,et al.  Dynamic topic models , 2006, ICML.

[8]  Baitong Chen,et al.  Understanding the topic evolution in a scientific domain: An exploratory study for the field of information retrieval , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[9]  JärvelinKalervo,et al.  Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005 , 2014 .

[10]  Leif Kajberg A citation Analysis of LIS Serial literature published in Denmark 1957-1986 , 1996, J. Documentation.

[11]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  Bibliometric evolution: Is the journal of the association for information science and technology transforming into a specialty Journal? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Virgil L. P. Blake,et al.  The Perceived Prestige of Professional Journals, 1995: A Replication of the Kohl-Davis Study. , 1996 .

[14]  Laura Manzari,et al.  Library and Information Science Journal Prestige as Assessed by Library and Information Science Faculty , 2013, The Library Quarterly.

[15]  Anna Kawalec,et al.  Research trends in library and information science based on Spanish scientific publication 2000 to 2010 , 2017 .

[16]  Denise Koufogiannakis,et al.  A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006-2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Topics over time: a non-Markov continuous-time model of topical trends , 2006, KDD '06.

[21]  Erjia Yan,et al.  Research dynamics: Measuring the continuity and popularity of research topics , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[22]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Fang Yang,et al.  Analyzing library and information science full‐text articles using a topic modeling approach , 2018, ASIST.

[24]  Silvia Salini,et al.  A decade of research in statistics: a topic model approach , 2015, Scientometrics.

[25]  Kun Lu,et al.  Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Mallikarjun Dora,et al.  An empirical analysis of the research trends in the field of library and information science in India –2004-2015 , 2017 .

[27]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Judith M. Nixon,et al.  Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals , 2014, Coll. Res. Libr..

[30]  Aditya K. Ghose,et al.  Analyzing Topics and Trends in the PRIMA Literature , 2016, PRIMA.

[31]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory Development in the Information Sciences. Diane H. Sonnenwald. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2016. 343 pp. $90.00 (Hardcover) (ISBN 978-1-4773-0824-0) , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Erjia Yan,et al.  Research dynamics, impact, and dissemination: A topic‐level analysis , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Marco R. Spruit,et al.  Full-Text or Abstract? Examining Topic Coherence Scores Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA).

[34]  Carlos G. Figuerola,et al.  Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA , 2017, Scientometrics.

[35]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Content Analysis in Library and Information Science Research. , 1990 .

[36]  Margam Madhusudhan,et al.  Mapping of topics in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, India: a study , 2019, Scientometrics.

[37]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  David F. Kohl,et al.  Ratings of Journals by ARL Library Directors and Deans of Library and Information Science Schools. , 1985 .

[39]  Jianhua Hou,et al.  Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) , 2018, Scientometrics.

[40]  Stephen E. Atkins Subject Trends in Library and Information Science Research, 1975-1984 , 1988 .

[41]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Studying the History of Ideas Using Topic Models , 2008, EMNLP.