In situ measurement of cylindricity—Problems and solutions

Abstract The paper is a critical review of existing methods that permit in situ measurement of large external cylindrical surfaces. Large size cylindrical elements are used in many industries, e.g. papermaking, metallurgy or shipbuilding. Their diameter can sometimes reach even a few meters and they can be several meters long. Such elements should be characterized by high dimensional and form accuracy. Excessive loads or changes in temperature during use may result in their deformation. It is thus important for such elements to have their surface quality and form accuracy controlled not only during production but also during use. Measurement with conventional devices would involve transport, which may be impractical or impossible due to the large size and mass. That is why industries where such elements are produced or employed expect measurements to be performed in situ, for example, directly on a machine tool. Methods that can be used for this purpose are generally divided into three groups: V-block measurement, multi-probe measurement and measurements with Articulated Arm Coordinate Measuring Machines (AACMMs). This paper describes advantages and disadvantages of all the three groups of methods suggesting which one best meets the requirements of modern manufacturing processes and which are the most prospective.

[1]  Slota Ján MODERN APPROACHES IN DEVELOPMENT OF PLASTIC PRODUCTS , 2009 .

[2]  K. Stępień,et al.  Cylindricity measurement by the V-block method – Theoretical and practical problems , 2011 .

[3]  Branimir Barišić,et al.  Air gauges as a part of the dimensional inspection systems , 2010 .

[4]  Samir Mekid,et al.  In-process out-of-roundness measurement probe for turned workpieces , 2011 .

[5]  Robert Čep,et al.  Aspects of Using Tool Axis Inclination Angle , 2011 .

[6]  Jiubin Tan,et al.  SSEST: A new approach to higher accuracy cylindricity measuring instrument , 2006 .

[7]  Wei Gao,et al.  On-machine roundness measurement of cylindrical workpieces by the combined three-point method , 1997 .

[8]  J. Valícek,et al.  Non-contact method for surface roughness measurement after machining , 2012 .

[9]  Goran Šimunović,et al.  A MODEL OF TOOL WEAR MONITORING SYSTEM FOR TURNING , 2013 .

[10]  Mehmet Cakmakci,et al.  Cylindricity — a well known problem and new solutions , 1992 .

[11]  Dean J.W. Dawson,et al.  Cylindricity and its measurement , 1992 .

[12]  Salah Hamed The influence of fitting algorithm and scanning speed on roundness error for 50 mm standard ring measurement using CMM , 2008 .

[13]  K. Stępień,et al.  Investigating the influence of selected factors on results of V-block cylindricity measurements , 2011 .

[14]  K. Stępień,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of the V-block method of cylindricity measurements , 2010 .

[15]  Juan Antonio Aguirre-Cruz,et al.  Inspection of the cylindrical surface feature after turning using coordinate metrology , 2007 .

[16]  Tomasz Stańczyk,et al.  The infrared measurement of form deviations of machine parts in motion , 2007 .

[17]  B. Muralikrishnan,et al.  A note on the three-point method for roundness measurement , 2005 .

[18]  Kimiyuki Mitsui,et al.  New analytical method for V-block three-point method , 2003 .

[19]  公之 三井,et al.  Vブロック法を用いた円筒コロの簡易円筒度測定(機械要素,潤滑,工作,生産管理など) , 2003 .

[20]  M. Behún,et al.  Prediction of Selected Aspects of Machinability of Austenitic Stainless Steels , 2013 .

[21]  Li Jun,et al.  In-situ measurement of cylindricity , 1990 .

[22]  Franci Cus,et al.  A Model of Surface Roughness Constitution in the Metal Cutting Process Applying Tools with Defined Stereometry , 2009 .