Chinese and Dutch Interpretations of Supervisory Feedback

Ina Chinese-Dutchscenariostudy(N = 433students), the authorsinvestigated subordinates’covert reactions to supervisory feedback. The study consisted of a 2 (personal orientation: collectivist vs. individualist) × 2 (performance perspective: collective vs. individual) × 2 (feedback favorability: positive vs. negative) completely crossed factorial design. The dependent variables were feedback quality, relational quality, emotional responses, and behavioral intentions. The authors found that feedback quality and relational quality tend to be higher for matched collectivist—collective and individualist—individual situations than for mismatched situations. They also found that collective situations enhance constructive behavioral intentions more than do individual situations and that positive feedback produces better information, better relationships, more pleasant emotions, and more constructive behavioral intentions than does equivalent negative feedback.

[1]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[2]  James R. Bailey,et al.  Conceptions of Self and Performance-Related Feedback in the U.S., Japan and China , 1997 .

[3]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback , 1986 .

[4]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[5]  L. D. Brown,et al.  Feedback and Organization Development: Using Data-Based Methods , 1978 .

[6]  James A. Breaugh,et al.  Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement , 2003 .

[7]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  R. Inglehart,et al.  Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook , 1998 .

[9]  L. Jussim,et al.  Reactions to Interpersonal Evaluative Feedback1 , 1989 .

[10]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: the role of negative affectivity. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  L. P. Cusella,et al.  Feedback, motivation, and performance. , 1987 .

[12]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[13]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  When is Criticism Not Constructive? The Roles of Fairness Perceptions and Dispositional Attributions in Employee Acceptance of Critical Supervisory Feedback , 2001 .

[14]  Kibeom Lee,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[16]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .

[17]  Martin Euwema,et al.  Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior , 1995 .

[18]  T. Tracey,et al.  An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Robert J. House,et al.  Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory. , 1997 .

[20]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[21]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[22]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  How are Responses to Verbal Insult Related to Cultural Collectivism and Power Distance? , 1985 .

[23]  Manuel London,et al.  Relationships between Feedback and Self-Development , 1999 .

[24]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[25]  R. Bennett,et al.  Development of a measure of workplace deviance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Administrative and Developmental Functions in Performance Appraisals: Conflict or Synergy? , 1989 .

[27]  Alicia M. Alvero,et al.  An Objective Review of the Effectiveness and Essential Characteristics of Performance Feedback in Organizational Settings (1985-1998) , 2001 .

[28]  J. Eugene Haas,et al.  Learning for Leadership.@@@Personal and Organizational Change Through Group Methods. , 1966 .

[29]  B. Meglino,et al.  The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An exami , 1994 .

[30]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[31]  P. Earley,et al.  “How Did I Do?” versus “How Did We Do?” , 1999 .

[32]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[33]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Individual versus Group Feedback in Cooperative Groups , 1994 .

[34]  Jana L. Raver,et al.  Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? , 1999, Psychological review.

[36]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[37]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism , 1996 .

[38]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology , 1997 .

[39]  C. Argyris.  Intervention theory and method : a behavioral science view. , 1970 .

[40]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Total quality management and performance appraisal: an experimental study of process versus results and group versus individual approaches , 1999 .

[42]  D. Kiesler,et al.  Contemporary Interpersonal Theory and Research: Personality, Psychopathology, and Psychotherapy , 1996 .

[43]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[44]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[45]  Onne Janssen,et al.  “Better than” Performance Motives as Roots of Satisfaction Across more and Less Developed Countries , 2002 .

[46]  H. Markus,et al.  Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Robert T. Golembiewski,et al.  Handbook of organizational consultation , 1993 .

[48]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Taking Stock in Our Progress on Individualism-Collectivism: 100 Years of Solidarity and Community , 1998 .

[49]  David A. Nadler,et al.  The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research , 1979 .

[50]  Fred Luthans,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Organizational Behavior Modification on Task Performance, 1975–95 , 1997 .