Pointing to double-step visual stimuli from a standing position: motor corrections when the speed–accuracy trade-off is unexpectedly modified in-flight. A breakdown of the perception–action coupling

The time required to complete a fast and accurate movement is a function of its amplitude and the target size. This phenomenon refers to the well known speed-accuracy trade-off. Some interpretations have suggested that the speed-accuracy trade-off is already integrated into the movement planning phase. More specifically, pointing movements may be planned to minimize the variance of the final hand position. However, goal-directed movements can be altered at any time, if for instance, the target location is changed during execution. Thus, one possible limitation of these interpretations may be that they underestimate feedback processes. To further investigate this hypothesis we designed an experiment in which the speed-accuracy trade-off was unexpectedly varied at the hand movement onset by modifying separately the target distance or size, or by modifying both of them simultaneously. These pointing movements were executed from an upright standing position. Our main results showed that the movement time increased when there was a change to the size or location of the target. In addition, the terminal variability of finger position did not change. In other words, it showed that the movement velocity is modulated according to the target size and distance during motor programming or during the final approach, independently of the final variability of the hand position. It suggests that when the speed-accuracy trade-off is unexpectedly modified, terminal feedbacks based on intermediate representations of the endpoint velocity are used to monitor and control the hand displacement. There is clearly no obvious perception-action coupling in this case but rather intermediate processing that may be involved.

[1]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  A Model of the Effects of Speed, Accuracy, and Perturbation on Visually Guided Reaching , 1992 .

[2]  B. Berret,et al.  Pointing to double-step visual stimuli from a standing position: very short latency (express) corrections are observed in upper and lower limbs and may not require cortical involvement , 2010, Neuroscience.

[3]  Lilian Fautrelle,et al.  Muscular synergies during motor corrections: Investigation of the latencies of muscle activities , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[7]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor task difficulty and brain activity: investigation of goal-directed reciprocal aiming using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  F. P. Kendall,et al.  Muscles: Testing and Function, with Posture and Pain , 1993 .

[9]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  J Paillard,et al.  Fast and slow feedback loops for the visual correction of spatial errors in a pointing task: a reappraisal. , 1996, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[11]  Dimitrios Pantazis,et al.  Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  D. Meyer,et al.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements. , 1982, Psychological review.

[14]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Sources of Inaccuracy in Rapid Movement , 1978 .

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  T. Milner Controlling velocity in rapid movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  N. Teasdale,et al.  Pointing to a target from an upright standing position: anticipatory postural adjustments are modulated by the size of the target in humans , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  D. Pélisson,et al.  On-line modification of saccadic eye movements by retinal signals , 2003, Neuroreport.

[22]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Bard,et al.  Control of Rapid Arm Movements When Target Position Is Altered During Saccadic Suppression. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[25]  Hiroshi Sekiya,et al.  Movement variability as a function of accuracy demand in programmed serial aiming responses , 1995 .

[26]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[27]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Speed—Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[28]  G. Stelmach Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[29]  Eran Stark,et al.  Distinct movement parameters are represented by different neurons in the motor cortex , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  J F Kalaska,et al.  Integration of predictive feedforward and sensory feedback signals for online control of visually guided movement. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Large-Field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during sinusoid tracing. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  H. Gomi Implicit online corrections of reaching movements , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999 .

[40]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .