Effect of Familiarity on the Processing of Human Faces

Most brain imaging studies on face perception have investigated the processing of unknown faces and addressed mainly the question of specific face processing in the human brain. The goal of this study was to highlight the effects of familiarity on the visual processing of faces. Using [15O]water 3D Positron Emission Tomography, regional cerebral blood flow distribution was measured in 11 human subjects performing an identical task (gender categorization) on both unknown and known faces. Subjects also performed two control tasks (a face recognition task and a visual pattern discrimination task). They were scanned after a training phase using videotapes during which they had been familiarized with and learned to recognize a set of faces. Two major results were obtained. On the one hand, we found bilateral activations of the fusiform gyri in the three face conditions, including the so-called fusiform-face area, a region in the right fusiform gyrus specifically devoted to face processing. This common activation suggests that different cognitive tasks performed on known and unknown faces require the involvement of this fusiform region. On the other hand, specific regional cerebral blood flow changes were related to the processing of known and unknown faces. The left amygdala, a structure involved in implicit learning of visual representations, was activated by the categorization task on unknown faces. The same task on known faces induced a relative decrease of activity in early visual areas. These differences between the two categorization tasks reveal that the human brain processes known and unknown faces differently.

[1]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  PET study of the human foveal fixation system , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans , 1995, Science.

[4]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Neurophysiology and functions of the primate amygdala. , 1992 .

[5]  D. Lindsley,et al.  Reaction time and EEG activation under alerted and nonalerted conditions. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[7]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Configural Coding, Expertise, and the Right Hemisphere Advantage for Face Recognition , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[9]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Fuster.  Effects of stimulation of brain stem on tachistoscopic perception. , 1958, Science.

[11]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Selectively distributed processing of visual object recognition in the temporal and frontal lobes of the human brain , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Cheryl L. Grady,et al.  Hemispheric differences in neural systems for face working memory: A PET‐rCBF study , 1995 .

[13]  E. Tulving,et al.  Memory beyond the hippocampus , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Relationship between Global and Local Changes in PET Scans , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation of Human Hippocampal Formation During Memory for Faces: A Pet Study , 1995, Cortex.

[17]  E. Tulving,et al.  Novelty encoding networks in the human brain: positron emission tomography data. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[18]  F. Perrin,et al.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[19]  L. Squire,et al.  The structure and organization of memory. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  The kinetic occipital (KO) area in human visual cortex: an fMRI study , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  N D Haig,et al.  The Effect of Feature Displacement on the Perception of Well-Known Faces , 1988, Perception.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[23]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  A Locus in Human Extrastriate Cortex for Visual Shape Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  B. Renault,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Human Auditory Attention Studied with PET , 1997, NeuroImage.

[26]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology , 1994 .

[27]  M. Posner,et al.  Images of mind , 1994 .

[28]  S. Rauch,et al.  Response and Habituation of the Human Amygdala during Visual Processing of Facial Expression , 1996, Neuron.

[29]  E. J. Thompson,et al.  The Amygdala. Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory and Mental Dysfunction , 1992 .

[30]  B. Macq,et al.  Interactive delineation of brain sulci and their merging into functional PET images , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[31]  J. R. Baker,et al.  The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Functional Brain Imaging Studies of Cortical Mechanisms for Memory , 1995, Science.

[34]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Heterogeneity in the cognitive manifestations of prosopagnosia: The study of a group of single cases , 1993 .

[37]  A. Damasio,et al.  Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity , 1988, Neurology.

[38]  C. Marescaux,et al.  [Late diagnosis of congenital argininemia during administration of sodium valproate]. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[39]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Brain regions involved in recognizing facial emotion or identity: an oxygen-15 PET study. , 1993, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[40]  A. Young,et al.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[43]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[44]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[45]  A. Damasio,et al.  The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[46]  J. Sergent,et al.  Segregated processing of facial identity and emotion in the human brain: A pet study , 1994 .

[47]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[48]  J Sergent,et al.  Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  J. Richard Hanley,et al.  Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy , 1995 .

[51]  R. Bruyer,et al.  The cognitive approach to familiar face processing in human subjects , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[52]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: An event related fMRI study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[53]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition Priming and Face Processing: Priming Occurs within the System that Responds to the Identity of a Face , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[54]  E. Warrington,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology: A Clinical Introduction , 1990 .

[55]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object and spatial visual working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  R Vogels,et al.  Human Brain Activity Related to Orientation Discrimination Tasks , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[57]  V. Bruce,et al.  Semantic Priming of Familiar Faces , 1986 .

[58]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Human Amygdala Activation during Conditioned Fear Acquisition and Extinction: a Mixed-Trial fMRI Study , 1998, Neuron.

[59]  R. Campbell,et al.  FACE RECOGNITION AND LIPREADING , 1986 .