Reducing tunnel vision with a pen‐and‐paper tool for the weighting of criminal evidence

[1]  Derek J. Koehler,et al.  Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  S. Kassin,et al.  On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk? , 2005, The American psychologist.

[3]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[4]  David A. Lagnado,et al.  A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Michael E. Doherty,et al.  Information Relevance, Working Memory, and the Consideration of Alternatives , 1993 .

[7]  P. Granhag,et al.  The 'Elasticity' of Criminal Evidence : A Moderator of Investigator Bias , 2008 .

[8]  P. Granhag,et al.  Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: the need for cognitive closure , 2005 .

[9]  E. Rassin.  Blindness to alternative scenarios in evidence evaluation , 2010 .

[10]  Ivan Hernandez,et al.  Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. , 2013 .

[11]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.

[12]  J. H. Kerstholt,et al.  Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysis , 2007 .

[13]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[14]  Barbara O'Brien.  Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations. , 2009 .

[15]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  “He's guilty!”: Investigator Bias in Judgments of Truth and Deception , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[16]  I. Dror,et al.  When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top‐down processing on matching fingerprints , 2005 .